Re: [Patch] New target to generate cscope database

2009-05-07 Thread Debarshi Ray
Updated patch: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/gnu/0001-New-target-to-generate-cscope-database.patch and inlined below. Changes: + Removed the -R being passed to cscope. It does, indeed, cause files not owned by the project to be indexed. (Ralf) + Added cscope to AM_RECURSIVE_TARGETS. Should it be

Re: [Patch] New target to generate cscope database

2009-05-07 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Debarshi, * Debarshi Ray wrote on Thu, May 07, 2009 at 11:51:52AM CEST: > >> I found a discussion involving Jesse Barnes > >> (http://sources.redhat.com/ml/automake/2004-07/msg00051.html) which > >> seemed inconclusive. I have tried this patch with Automake 1.10.2 and > >> the msmtp source base

Re: [Patch] New target to generate cscope database

2009-05-07 Thread Ben Pfaff
Ralf Wildenhues writes: > Does cscope offer enough additional functionality over, say, > Exuberant Ctags or gtags, to warrant being supported? Do many people > use it? The most useful feature of cscope that is not in *tags (as far as I know) is that it maintains a list of source code locations

Re: [Patch] New target to generate cscope database

2009-05-07 Thread Debarshi Ray
>> I found a discussion involving Jesse Barnes >> (http://sources.redhat.com/ml/automake/2004-07/msg00051.html) which >> seemed inconclusive. I have tried this patch with Automake 1.10.2 and >> the msmtp source base and it seems to work, but my knowledge of >> Automake's internals and Perl is zero.