Re: may Automake rely on _AC_SUBST_VARS?

2009-04-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Eric Blake wrote on Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 04:41:58AM CEST: > According to Ralf Wildenhues on 4/6/2009 2:48 PM: > > This variable is undocumented, but has been used much before 2.62 > > (which is the Autoconf version current Automake requires). Would > > it be ok to rely on this undocumented varia

Re: may Automake rely on _AC_SUBST_VARS?

2009-04-06 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [adding automake-patches] According to Ralf Wildenhues on 4/6/2009 2:48 PM: > This variable is undocumented, but has been used much before 2.62 > (which is the Autoconf version current Automake requires). Would > it be ok to rely on this undocumented

a couple of minor testsuite patches

2009-04-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
I've pushed these two simple patches to next, to eat our own dog food, and to avoid interference from outer "make check TEST_LOGS=..." etc. Cheers, Ralf testsuite: generate $(parallel_tests) just when needed. * tests/Makefile.am (check_SCRIPTS): No need to list $(parallel_tests)

Re: recheck, recheck-html, check-html

2009-04-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 07:52:01AM CEST: > --- a/lib/am/check.am > +++ b/lib/am/check.am > +recheck recheck-html: > + @target=`echo $@ | sed 's,^re,,'`; \ > + list='$(TEST_LOGS)';\ > +## If the