On Nov 6, 2007, at 5:04 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Benoit Sigoure wrote on Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 01:24:11AM CET:
On Nov 5, 2007, at 10:09 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Would be good to also have a test with a program that does not
exist,
i.e., a test that exposes all aspects of `missing's func
* Benoit Sigoure wrote on Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 01:24:11AM CET:
> On Nov 5, 2007, at 10:09 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> >>By the way, the TODO file seems to have many rusted entries that
> >>have been lying there for too long or completed since a long time
> >>already.
> >
> >Yes. If you could
On Nov 5, 2007, at 10:09 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
On Nov 4, 2007, at 1:49 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
This is fine with me, given that we document AM_MISSING_PROG in
Automake. That is not completely trivial, though: typically, the
"missing" script needs adjustment for tools, making it un-gen
On Nov 5, 2007, at 8:14 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Benoit,
* Benoit SIGOURE wrote on Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 08:44:50PM CET:
--- a/tests/Makefile.am
+++ b/tests/Makefile.am
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ alpha.test \
alpha2.test \
amassign.test \
ammissing.test \
+ammissingprog.test \
amopt.test \
Hello Benoit,
* Benoit Sigoure wrote on Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 08:22:37PM CET:
> Please drop autoconf-patches when replying. Thanks.
Done.
> On Nov 4, 2007, at 1:49 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > This is fine with me, given that we document AM_MISSING_PROG in
> > Automake. That is not comple
Hello Bob,
Thanks for your and Benoit's feedback!
* Bob Proulx wrote on Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 12:47:02AM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > Does anybody know how to test that colorful output actually happens?
>
> Since the colorful output of check.mk now uses 'tput' and 'tput' uses
> TERM, it shou
Hello Benoit,
* Benoit SIGOURE wrote on Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 08:44:50PM CET:
>> --- a/tests/Makefile.am
>> +++ b/tests/Makefile.am
>> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ alpha.test \
>> alpha2.test \
>> amassign.test \
>> ammissing.test \
>> +ammissingprog.test \
>> amopt.test \
>> amsubst.test \
>> ansi.test
On Nov 5, 2007, at 5:01 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Benoit Sigoure wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
For example when capturing output with 'script' all of those
escape sequences get in the way.
If you do this, it will DWYM unless you have a broken implementation
of `test -t' (which should be reported so w
Benoit Sigoure wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> >For example when capturing output with 'script' all of those
> >escape sequences get in the way.
>
> If you do this, it will DWYM unless you have a broken implementation
> of `test -t' (which should be reported so we can mention it in the
> "limitat
On Nov 5, 2007, at 1:13 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Benoit SIGOURE wrote:
Now I think that the no-color-tests could be useful for those out
there that are allergic to fancy colors and stuff, so I think it'll
be worth implementing it (which is easy).
I am not quite alergic to it but put me in the bl
10 matches
Mail list logo
