Re: [cygwin] Analysis for new testsuite failures 33,34.35

2007-03-27 Thread Charles Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:39:24 +0200, "Ralf Wildenhues" said: AFAICS, this can only happen if libltdl was treated with automake-1.9 and the tests run with automake-1.10 in place, so that the toplevel package (named subproject-demo-2.1a) is treated with 1.10. I'm not so

Re: [cygwin] Analysis for new testsuite failures 33,34.35

2007-03-27 Thread libtool
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:39:24 +0200, "Ralf Wildenhues" said: > Hi Charles, > > Thanks for the bug report. > > * Charles Wilson wrote on Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 07:32:12AM CET: > > > > ../../libtool-HEAD/tests/subproject.at:56: $MAKE all $tst_dist > > + make all dist > [...] > > mkdir: cannot create

[cygwin] Analysis for new testsuite failures 33,34.35

2007-03-27 Thread Charles Wilson
In this message: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2007-03/msg00030.html I mentioned that I had observed three new failures in the testsuite: 33,34,35: new regressions in CVS between 20070205 and 20070316 I think the CVS dates are a red herring. The error message in tests