Re: FYI: _SCRIPTS doc retake

too fast 2006-08-04 Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * doc/automake.texi (Scripts): Fix some errors in previous patch. Index: doc/automake.texi === RCS file: /cvs/automake/automake/doc/automake.texi,v retrieving re

FYI: _SCRIPTS doc retake

I'm checking this in. 2006-08-04 Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * doc/automake.texi (Scripts): Revamp. Show an example of script built from configure.ac. Discuss CLEANFILES and EXTRA_DIST for other built scripts. Index: doc/automake.texi

FYI: diagnose old-style AC_INIT with new-style AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE

Found this on an old TODO-list. If a beginner type AC_INIT AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE without further arguments, he gets a confusing error message about AC_PACKAGE_VERSION: configure:1943: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PACKAGE_TARNAME If this token and others are legitimate, please use

Re: Creating subdirs of distdir

Hello, On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:54:23PM +0200, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > I'm installing this as follows, removing another reference to > DISTDIRS in dist.am, fixing distdir.test so it passes, and > fixing the (c) year of pr2.test, thank you very much for the fixes. (I wonder why I thought

Re: Creating subdirs of distdir

Thank you, and sorry for the delay. I'm installing this as follows, removing another reference to DISTDIRS in dist.am, fixing distdir.test so it passes, and fixing the (c) year of pr2.test, 2006-08-04 Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * automake.in (dist_dirs, fill_dist_dirs): Remove.

Re: automake crash

>>> "BW" == Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BW> Hi, BW> automake just crashed on me, and it told me to send a mail BW> here, so I do. :-) Hi Bas, thanks for doing so. BW> This is what it says: BW> Makefile.am:184: unterminated conditionals: DEBUGGING_TRUE DEPRECATION_TRUE This mean

Re: aclocal --diff on Tru64

On second though I'm less happy the "global" empty file. The reason is that we can use --diff='diff -u' or any other tools that shows the filename in its output, and such a global file would look weird. It occurred to me that there is a simpler approach that does not require any configury magic,

Re: proposed patch to support Unified Parallel C (version 3 of patch)

Hi Jonathan, Congratulations on the patch, and thanks for making it complete. It looks great, but I can see a couple of minor problems. My main complaint is that your tests do not show that building a upc program actually work. [...] JH> @itemx maude_LFLAGS JH> @itemx maude_OBJCFLAGS JH> @it