Hi Alexandre,
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
MA> This is a proposed patch to use partial linking with Automake-1.9.6
Thanks for the proposal, I plan to look at it on saturday. 1.9.6 is a problem
since this branch is two-year old.
Not a problem, I will look at the CVS code base and see how
Hi Alexandre,
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 07:31:56AM CET:
> >>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> RW> Hmm. AFAIK the make launched won't necessarily override the
> RW> distdir = $(PACKAGE)-$(VERSION)
>
> RW> which it reads from the Makefile, wit
>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RW> Hi Alexandre,
RW> * Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 08:37:57AM CET:
>> >>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RW> [3] The $(MAKE) invocation for the subpackage `distdir' is not
RW> portable to all
>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RW> OK to apply this patch? Sorry about all that noise.
Sure!
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Shared books are happy books. http://www.bookcrossing.com/friend/gadl
Hello,
> I prefer to use the active voice (and present, not past) in ChangeLog
> entries.
actually, I prefer it, too. It's just that when someone told me to use the
past tense, I found his reasons stronger than mine. But I continued to use
the imperatives, anyway.
> The same goes for comments
Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The changelog informs about what _was done_ so there is no reason to use
> present tense or imperative.
>
> I think I remember being corrected that something like
>
> * dir/kill.c (killer): Add line to kill `foo.'
>
> should rather be
>
> * dir/
