Hi Gary,
>>> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Gary> Hallo again,
Gary> It turns out that the automake patch is not enough :-(
Sorry, I think you are misunderstanding the purpose of
AC_CONFIG_LIBOBJ_DIR. But you are breaking common uses of
@LIBOBJS@ while bending it the way
Hi Paul,
Paul Eggert wrote:
> I like the patch from the Autoconf point of view, assuming the Automake
> folks take their bit.
Thanks.
> One small point:
>
> "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>+ac_libobj_dir=
>>+test "X${ac_config_libobj_dir-.}" != X. &&
>>+ ac_libobj_dir=`echo
Hi Jim,
Thanks for the patch. I'm installing this on branch-1-9 too.
>>> "Jim" == Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jim> I didn't think it deserved more mention than this.
Jim> If you'd like, I'll send to a mailing list, too:
Please, always do that. I can't stand private mail about p
I like the patch from the Autoconf point of view, assuming the Automake
folks take their bit. One small point:
"Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +ac_libobj_dir=
> +test "X${ac_config_libobj_dir-.}" != X. &&
> + ac_libobj_dir=`echo "$ac_config_libobj_dir/" | sed 's,/*$,/,'`
That w
Hallo again,
It turns out that the automake patch is not enough :-(
Attached is an improved patch against automake-1.9.5 (applies to branch-1-9
and HEAD with fuzz). When applied, if configure.ac declares
AC_CONFIG_LIBOBJ_DIR, then automake will look in that directory for
AC_LIBSOURCE declared fi
Hallo!
While trying to convert libtool HEAD to use a single toplevel Makefile.am,
I discovered that neither branch-1-9 or HEAD of automake pay heed to the
AC_CONFIG_LIBOBJ_DIR declaration in configure.ac.
With this patch, using a single top-level Makefile.am, Libtool can now build
libltdl/libltdl
