Hi Robin,
thanks for the explanation. If that's a rule it's not applied very
consistently then: see python-black, python-pip and plenty of other
packages in the arch main repo that also have an executable in bin. I'll
work things out with @Xeonacid. I see he added me as a co-maintainer,
thanks.
G
On 2025-02-11 16:32, Robin Candau wrote:
> @Xeonacid May I ask you to sort such things out in collaboration with the
> original maintainer next time? Submitting a new package and filling a merge
> request like this without any upfront notice isn't nice, indeed. Can you
> please discuss with Guil
Hello Guillaume,
The `python-` prefix is reserved for packages that (only) provide python
libraries / modules. The docformatter package provides
`/usr/bin/docformatter` which can be used as-is. The sole reason that it
is a program developed in python or that it should be used in a python
ecos
Can this merge be reconsidered? The right name should be
python-docformatter. This is a python package to format python docstrings,
it clearly belongs to the python ecosystem, like python-black for instance.
In any case, if there is a disagreement on the name, giving some notice to
the original mai
Can this merge be reverted? The python-docformatter name was perfectly
legitimate. In addition, nobody contacted me to suggest a name change. User
creates a new package with no dependency, asks for a merge on the same day
and this is accepted. This is just package stealing, and it breaks another
pa
