Re: [PRQ#57379] Merge Request for wechat-beta-bwrap

2024-03-27 Thread Kimiblock Moe
Hi all, Sorry for not being aware of this list updating. I'm writing to request PMs' merge approval, due to the fact that wechat-beta-bwrap is clearly a duplicate package of wechat-uos-bwrap as discussed in aur-general[a][b]. > This is not right, different from `wechat-uos-bwrap`, which exp

Re: [PRQ#57379] Merge Request for wechat-beta-bwrap

2024-03-12 Thread Guoxin Pu
Hello, I'm 7Ji, the co-maintiner of `wechat-beta-bwrap`, I've improved the package in various ways since I've invited as the co-maintainer by the original maintainer lilongyu after the PRQ, and I'm writing in oppose to this merge request. This package is basically wechat-uos-bwrap This is n

Re: [PRQ#57379] Merge Request for wechat-beta-bwrap

2024-03-10 Thread longyu li
the wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-uos have nothing to do with each other. 于2024年3月7日周四 15:11写道: > Kimiblock [1] filed a request to merge wechat-beta-bwrap [2] into > wechat-uos-bwrap [3]: > > This package is basically wechat-uos-bwrap, with no sandboxing which > means this proprietary app can obt