Request #34142 has been Rejected by yan12125 [1]:
This request is no longer valid as the relevant package is deleted.
[PRQ#34144] https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-
requests/2022-April/070361.html
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yan12125/
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 09:21:17 -0500
Pedro A. López-Valencia wrote:
> I agree with you Doug. The package is a stop gap measure as is. The
> issue at hand is that vi-vim-symlink has not been touched in 7 years and
> uses a fancy shell function that is as of this month it is apparently
> broken, see
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 10:52:32 +
notify--- via aur-requests wrote:
> toropisco [1] filed a request to merge vi-vim-symlink [2] into vim-vi
> [3]:
>
> vim-vi is a better maintained package that supports both vim and gvim
> and covers all possible invoking names that emulate original vi
> featur
toropisco [1] filed a request to merge vi-vim-symlink [2] into vim-vi
[3]:
vim-vi is a better maintained package that supports both vim and gvim
and covers all possible invoking names that emulate original vi
features.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/toropisco/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org
