[PRQ#52359] Merge Request for gtk3-no_deadkeys_underline Rejected

2023-12-23 Thread notify
Request #52359 has been Rejected by MarsSeed [1]: Revoking merge proposal, as per maintainer's wish. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/

Re: [PRQ#52359] Merge Request for gtk3-no_deadkeys_underline

2023-12-22 Thread Albert Astals Cid
I've no idea if I'm supposed to answer this via email or some other way :D My answer is "no", i don't want to merge gtk3-no_deadkeys_underline into gtk3- classic People can use gtk3-classic, it's probably better maintained and tested than gtk3-no_deadkeys_underline, but I am personally not inter

[PRQ#52359] Merge Request for gtk3-no_deadkeys_underline

2023-12-21 Thread notify
MarsSeed [1] filed a request to merge gtk3-no_deadkeys_underline [2] into gtk3-classic [3]: I propose this package merge, as 'gtk3-classic' is a community- maintained, GitHub CI-tested modded fork of gtk3, and it includes the no_deadkeys_underline patch, as well as others which are intended to und