Request #51406 has been Rejected by MarsSeed [1]:
Package can be built after minimal PKGBUILD adjustment.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/
Just built both gnucash-git and gnucash-docs-git THRICE over the past two
daysNot sure what problem you are experiencing,but perhaps IO can help
you with some kind of feedback from you.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 6:40 PM Marcell Meszaros
wrote:
> No, it doesn't build.
>
>
> On 20 December 2023
No, it doesn't build.
On 20 December 2023 02:51:54 GMT+01:00, nmlibertar...@gmail.com wrote:
>But it DOES build !!! Just now did same. Really. Honest 'injun. truly. AND
>it DOES supply the "docs" package to the main program; gnucash-git. (Which
>also builds and runs too.)
>
>On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 a
But it DOES build !!! Just now did same. Really. Honest 'injun. truly. AND
it DOES supply the "docs" package to the main program; gnucash-git. (Which
also builds and runs too.)
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 3:46 PM Marcell Meszaros
wrote:
> It is not useful to keep a package that fails to build due to
It is not useful to keep a package that fails to build due to (make)depending
on deprecated, unmaintained, broken package(s).
On 19 December 2023 21:04:28 GMT+01:00, nmlibertar...@gmail.com wrote:
>This should remain separate much as the gnucash version release and
>gnucash-docs version release a
This should remain separate much as the gnucash version release and
gnucash-docs version release are separate in the extra repos. FURTHER, it
is up to date and does compile and work, as does gnucash-git.
Best regards - Not_Anonymous
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 6:48 AM wrote:
> MarsSeed [1] filed a
MarsSeed [1] filed a request to merge gnucash-docs-git [2] into
gnucash-git [3]:
Not useful to keep the broken pkgbase=gnucash-docs-git.
It was last changed in 2015, and has been failing to build since at
least 2020 due to makedepends=rarian's reported FTBFS that year, which
persists to this day.
