Re: [PRQ#49734] Orphan Request for glaxnimate-git Rejected

2023-11-28 Thread Sythelux Rikd
Alright. Mattbas disabled the push from master for now. I want to emphasize, that we did that because users came to the gitlab repo and complained that the version in the -git repo is older than the pure glaxnimate aur package. For us it is just a bit alien why the -git packages have version number

Re: [PRQ#49734] Orphan Request for glaxnimate-git Rejected

2023-11-28 Thread dersyth
Neither me nor glax are using arch linux anymore and we'd need a packager with experience. I can talk to him removing the bot and we can stale this until a packager is found. We set the pkgver, because the git repo looks outdated else, or how do other -git packages handle this issue? On 07.11

Re: [PRQ#49734] Orphan Request for glaxnimate-git Rejected

2023-11-06 Thread Muflone
Il 07/11/23 00:18, ders...@gmail.com ha scritto: Neither me nor glax are using arch linux anymore and we'd need a packager with experience. I can talk to him removing the bot and we can stale this until a packager is found. We set the pkgver, because the git repo looks outdated else, or how

Re: [PRQ#49734] Orphan Request for glaxnimate-git Rejected

2023-11-06 Thread Marcell Meszaros
But @xiota was right about this package. Only CI bot AUR user @mattbas pushes unnecessary version bumps with a bogus version quoted in commit message, and no one is resolving the actual packaging issues present in this. @Muflone, I think this package should either be orphaned in the hope that s

[PRQ#49734] Orphan Request for glaxnimate-git Rejected

2023-11-06 Thread notify
Request #49734 has been Rejected by muflone [1]: the package was updated [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/muflone/