Sure, if you'd read one single bullet point after the one you cited:
> Exception to this strict rule may only be packages having extra features
> enabled and/or patches in comparison to the official ones. In such an
> occasion the pkgname should be different to express that difference.
Check an
Btw submitting this request was not just a "Marcell" whim, there's ample
precedent.
See @Muflone's deletion request against a user-submitted firefox-xdg:
[PRQ#48496] (7 Oct '23)
https://lists.archlinux.org/hyperkitty/list/aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org/thread/6L2R7CBSOUBVKDCLGBWHISIEUHSL2KSO
>> Exception to this strict rule may only be packages having extra features
>> enabled and/or patches in comparison to the official ones. In such an
>> occasion the pkgname should be different to express that difference.
>
>Check and check. If you're going to cite the rules, make sure you've read
On 27 February 2024 03:48:20 GMT+01:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
>Request #48780 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
>
>Personal disagreement with a particular patch is not an acceptable
>reason to file a deletion request.
There was nothing personal in my submission reason.
What about AUR's
Request #48780 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
Personal disagreement with a particular patch is not an acceptable
reason to file a deletion request.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/
