I would ask that the maintainer open a request to merge the packages, then,
given the comment history that I read shows you being belligerent about
conky-lua-nv being unncessary as the maintainer rightfully defends a package
that predates the one you claim to be superior.
Marcell, you are not t
On 27 February 2024 04:48:15 GMT+01:00, a...@serebit.com wrote:
>I would ask that the maintainer open a request to merge the packages, then,
>given the comment history that I read shows you being belligerent about
>conky-lua-nv being unncessary as the maintainer rightfully defends a package
>tha
The arguments made by the maintainer appear to hold up, and until
>https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/conky/-/issues/1
>is resolved, this package does have *some* reason to exist. Closing.
Which arguments exactly? Repo package has all the features that this has.
Only AUR/co
Request #48746 has been Rejected by serebit [1]:
The arguments made by the maintainer appear to hold up, and until
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/conky/-/issues/1
is resolved, this package does have *some* reason to exist. Closing.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/
