Re: [PRQ#43162] Deletion Request for python2-taskw

2023-07-10 Thread Arvedui
That kind of reasoning makes sense for the official repositories where (binary)packages are distributed and there is a non trivial cost associated with that distribution. The AUR is mostly about sharing PKGBUILDs and the cost of having a PKGBUILD on the AUR is basically non existing and is mostly

Re: [PRQ#43162] Deletion Request for python2-taskw

2023-07-10 Thread Marcel Röthke
On 2023-07-09 15:46:04, Marcell Meszaros wrote: > AUR submission guidelines state the following [a]: > > “• Make sure the package you want to upload is useful. Will anyone else want > to use this package? Is it extremely specialized? If more than a few people > would find this package useful, it

Re: [PRQ#43162] Deletion Request for python2-taskw

2023-07-10 Thread Arvedui
Sorry, the last message was sent from the wrong mail address.

[PRQ#43162] Deletion Request for python2-taskw Rejected

2023-07-09 Thread notify
Request #43162 has been Rejected by MarsSeed [1]: Revoking the request, please kindly disregard. Maintainer @Arvedui explained that this package is still useful, as people might still have personal, local scripts for customized tasks. That is a prime use case of taskwarrior and its Python binding

Re: [PRQ#43162] Deletion Request for python2-taskw

2023-07-09 Thread Marcell Meszaros
Hi Marcel, Thank you for your detailed response. Now I understand your reasons to keep this package. I see that the following point is especially relevant to the use case of taskwarrior and its Python2/3 bindings: >Installing a library for a local script that is not in a package is a >very vali

Re: [PRQ#43162] Deletion Request for python2-taskw

2023-07-09 Thread Marcell Meszaros
AUR submission guidelines state the following [a]: “• Make sure the package you want to upload is useful. Will anyone else want to use this package? Is it extremely specialized? If more than a few people would find this package useful, it is appropriate for submission.” Python2 is EOL since 2 y

Re: [PRQ#43162] Deletion Request for python2-taskw

2023-07-02 Thread Marcell Meszaros
+1 for @gromit's observation. As this is a Python2 library, to be consumed by other Python2 packages, I see no need to keep it on AUR. Because nothing depends on it. On 2 July 2023 17:20:15 GMT+02:00, Christian Heusel wrote: >On 23/06/30 08:40AM, Arvedui wrote: >> I think this can still be usef

Re: [PRQ#43162] Deletion Request for python2-taskw

2023-07-02 Thread Christian Heusel
On 23/06/30 08:40AM, Arvedui wrote: > I think this can still be usefull and should not be deleted. Whats the usecase? As far as I can tell there is a python3 variant of this module ... cheers, gromit signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [PRQ#43162] Deletion Request for python2-taskw

2023-06-30 Thread Arvedui
On 2023-06-29 16:55:25, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for python2-taskw [2]: > > Unneeded Python 2 API for taskwarrior CLI. > > Nothing depends on it. AUR has the newer Py3 variant. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ > [2] https://aur.archl

[PRQ#43162] Deletion Request for python2-taskw

2023-06-29 Thread notify
MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for python2-taskw [2]: Unneeded Python 2 API for taskwarrior CLI. Nothing depends on it. AUR has the newer Py3 variant. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python2-taskw/