[PRQ#42162] Deletion Request for libopenblas Accepted

2023-07-08 Thread notify
Request #42162 has been Accepted by tpkessler [1]: [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for libopenblas. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/tpkessler/

Re: [PRQ#42162] Deletion Request for libopenblas

2023-06-14 Thread Marcell Meszaros
The issue mentioned in the following bug report: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78725 is theoretical. In the sense that there are currently zero packages in AUR that are affected by it. On 15 June 2023 01:11:34 GMT+02:00, sL1pKn07 SpinFlo wrote: >El jue, 15 jun 2023 a las 1:09, Marcell Meszar

Re: [PRQ#42162] Deletion Request for libopenblas

2023-06-14 Thread sL1pKn07 SpinFlo
El jue, 15 jun 2023 a las 1:09, Marcell Meszaros (< marcell.mesza...@runbox.eu>) escribió: > There is no 32-bit build of openblas in AUR, and there is no 32-bit > consumer of openblas in AUR. > > Your complaints are nonsensical at worst and nonexistent, theoretical at > best. > > No harm will be d

Re: [PRQ#42162] Deletion Request for libopenblas

2023-06-14 Thread Marcell Meszaros
There is no 32-bit build of openblas in AUR, and there is no 32-bit consumer of openblas in AUR. Your complaints are nonsensical at worst and nonexistent, theoretical at best. No harm will be done in deleting AUR/libopenblas which is a duplicate of [extra] openblas. AUR submission guidelines s

Re: [PRQ#42162] Deletion Request for libopenblas

2023-06-14 Thread sL1pKn07 SpinFlo
yes if a new user tries to install itself in local. If try to install it with openblas in repo, it fails because file conflicts. and if forced to install, when trying to build a 64 bits program with 64bits openblas, gets link failed because cmake found the 32bit libs because new cmake files point

Re: [PRQ#42162] Deletion Request for libopenblas

2023-06-14 Thread Marcell Meszaros
The linked bug report should be addressed, but that does not necessitate keeping AUR/libopenblas. As there is no lib32-(lib)openblas package and nothing in AUR seem to need a multilib version of openblas. Also, AUR submission guidelines also mandate no copying of repo packages to address packa

Re: [PRQ#42162] Deletion Request for libopenblas

2023-06-14 Thread sL1pKn07 SpinFlo
El jue, 15 jun 2023 a las 0:02, escribió: > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for libopenblas [2]: > > This has not been needed for quite some time, as Arch repo carries > openblas, including its libs, and it can be installed side-by-side > with blas. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account

[PRQ#42162] Deletion Request for libopenblas

2023-06-14 Thread notify
MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for libopenblas [2]: This has not been needed for quite some time, as Arch repo carries openblas, including its libs, and it can be installed side-by-side with blas. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/libopen