[PRQ#40407] Deletion Request for aerc-no-notmuch-git Rejected

2023-04-09 Thread notify
Request #40407 has been Rejected by serebit [1]: Automated request. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/serebit/

Re: [PRQ#40407] Deletion Request for aerc-no-notmuch-git

2023-03-05 Thread aur
Hi, I think this does not apply then. As shown by the -git suffix, this is a development package, and having notmuch included or not can lead to differences. Especially when aerc's merge of the notmuch and maildir workers is completed. For this reason, I think the package should stay in one way or

Re: [PRQ#40407] Deletion Request for aerc-no-notmuch-git

2023-03-05 Thread aur
On Tue Feb 28, 2023 at 10:03 PM CET, notify at aur.archlinux.org wrote: > Not allowed by AUR submission guidelines Would you mind explaining what point of the guidelines this is violating? Looking at the Mailing List, this looks a lot like Request-abuse to me. -- Moritz Poldrack https://moritz.sh

Re: [PRQ#40407] Deletion Request for aerc-no-notmuch-git

2023-03-01 Thread irecca . kun
On 3/1/23 20:43, a...@moritz.poldrack.dev wrote: Hi, I think this does not apply then. As shown by the -git suffix, this is a development package, and having notmuch included or not can lead to differences. Especially when aerc's merge of the notmuch and maildir workers is completed. For this rea

Re: [PRQ#40407] Deletion Request for aerc-no-notmuch-git

2023-02-28 Thread irecca . kun
On 3/1/23 02:59, a...@moritz.poldrack.dev wrote: On Tue Feb 28, 2023 at 10:03 PM CET, notify at aur.archlinux.org wrote: Not allowed by AUR submission guidelines Would you mind explaining what point of the guidelines this is violating? Looking at the Mailing List, this looks a lot like Request-

[PRQ#40407] Deletion Request for aerc-no-notmuch-git

2023-02-28 Thread notify
Hanabishi [1] filed a deletion request for aerc-no-notmuch-git [2]: Not allowed by AUR submission guidelines [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Hanabishi/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/aerc-no-notmuch-git/