[PRQ#39978] Deletion Request for ecode

2023-01-29 Thread Boris Barbulovski
I made the mistake of not naming the package with '-git' suffix. This project has a potential for success, thus I want to make it easy for users to try it, but, without any kind of guarantee of course. Will a new package name ecode-git be sufficient to stay in AUR? I can make small improvements

[PRQ#39978] Deletion Request for ecode Accepted

2023-01-28 Thread notify
Request #39978 has been Accepted by blakkheim [1]: Package does a git clone in build(), has no source array, has all kinds of weird trickery with make, is a mislabeled -git package... many problems here. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/blakkheim/

[PRQ#39978] Deletion Request for ecode

2023-01-28 Thread notify
j1simon [1] filed a deletion request for ecode [2]: This package is totally wrong. It compiles git version but it says compiles stable version. Just look at the contents of the PKGBUILD, it does not meet the minimum requirements. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/j1simon/ [2] https://aur.arch