Re: [PRQ#64684] Orphan Request for asoundconf

2024-10-30 Thread jahway603
Please remove this "Ophan Request" from asoundconf & in the future contact a package maintainer before submitting any such request. Also, I have been able to build this package fine on numerous Arch Linux systems. Furthermore, as seen on AUR: "By submitting an orphan request, you ask a Package

Re: [PRQ#54226] Deletion Request for ly-git-openrc

2024-02-27 Thread jahway603
elete the Arch Wiki page about OpenRC (https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/OpenRC)? On Tuesday, February 27th, 2024 at 11:50 AM, Robin Candau wrote: > On 2/27/24 16:38, jahway603 wrote: > > > THIS SHOULD NOT BE DELETED as the AUR is used by Arch and ALL derivatives > > of Arch, lik

Re: [PRQ#54149] Deletion Request for chkservice-git

2024-02-27 Thread jahway603
THIS PACKAGE HAS NOW BEEN FIXED, SO DO NOT DELETE THIS. I WAS NOT THE ORIGINAL PACKAGER OR MAINTAINER, BUT THIS PACKAGE IS NOW FIXED. On Saturday, February 24th, 2024 at 5:49 PM, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for chkservice-git [2]: > > Upstream repos

Re: [PRQ#54226] Deletion Request for ly-git-openrc

2024-02-27 Thread jahway603
THIS SHOULD NOT BE DELETED as the AUR is used by Arch and ALL derivatives of Arch, like Artix, Manjaro, EndeavourOS, etc. On Monday, February 26th, 2024 at 2:11 PM, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for ly-git-openrc [2]: > > Problematic, but unneeded VCS

Re: [PRQ#49836] Deletion Request for lib32-gd

2024-01-19 Thread jahway603
I disagree with the deletion request for this package. This software is still receiving updates, as you will see from their git repo https://github.com/libgd/libgd/commits/master/ This PKGBUILD contains no mention of "lib32-libgphoto2" whatsoever, as we see at: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur

Re: [PRQ#41222] Deletion Request for jami-daemon-wtf

2023-05-09 Thread jahway603
NO DELETE The upstream community package had been broken for almost half a year. I put a LOT of effort into making this work. Please do not delete my hard work. --- Original Message --- On Sunday, April 30th, 2023 at 12:00 AM, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: > yochananmarqos [1] file

Re: [PRQ#41221] Deletion Request for jami-qt-wtf

2023-05-09 Thread jahway603
NO DELETE The upstream community package had been broken for almost half a year. I put a LOT of effort into making this work. Please do not delete my hard work. --- Original Message --- On Saturday, April 29th, 2023 at 11:59 PM, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: > yochananmarqos [1] f

Re: [PRQ#37466] Deletion Request for featherwallet-bin

2022-09-19 Thread jahway603
THIS PACKAGE SHOULD NOT BE DELETED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. If you look @ monero-feather's PKGBUILD, you will see the following in it: build() { cd "${srcdir}/${pkgname}" make release } That means that "monero-feather" is compiling this from source code and is named correctly. 2. If yo