Re: [PRQ#70024] Deletion Request for wacom-utility

2025-02-18 Thread dreieck
Ahoj, On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 12:39:34 +0100, Marcell Meszaros wrote: > On 17 February 2025 15:30:29 GMT+01:00, dreieck > wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 03:07:24 +, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: > > > > > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for wacom-utility [

Re: [PRQ#69863] Deletion Request for folks-telepathy-git

2025-02-17 Thread dreieck
I am not wanting to maintain it, so do with it what you want. On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 10:31:59 +, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for folks-telepathy-git [2]: > > Unused: 0 pkgstats. > Seems all Telepathy modules have been EOL for 8-15 years and there are

Re: [PRQ#69862] Deletion Request for empathy

2025-02-17 Thread dreieck
I am not wanting to maintain it, so do with it what you want. On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 10:25:08 +, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for empathy [2]: > > Build is broken. If built with depends=folks-telepathy-git, it is > broken during runtime. > > Was delet

Re: [PRQ#70024] Deletion Request for wacom-utility

2025-02-17 Thread dreieck
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 03:07:24 +, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for wacom-utility [2]: > > EOL stable version from 2011. > Current Wacom tablets are unsupported. But oder hardware is still functional. So I object this deletion request. Maybe an updat

Re: [PRQ#65870] Merge Request for rtl-433-git

2024-11-19 Thread dreieck
I see that rtl_433-git now build for me despite that the issue [0] got no attention from the maintainer. Maybe an upstream change. So I now also think `rtl-433-git` should be removed in favour of `rtl_433-git`, and I am going to submit a deletion request because of duplocate. [0] https://aur.arc

Re: [PRQ#57560] Deletion Request for kate-root

2024-03-09 Thread dreieck
If broken please report in the comments, that is what they are for; I actually have fixed it recently. I maintain the package, and I use and need it. "totally unneeded" I want to refute, since "official" kate refuses to run as root (and for me also under sudo!). If you thin "totally uneeded", pl

? Rule that AUR packages have to be compatible with mainline Arch -- Re: [PRQ#52601] Deletion Request for libratbag-nosystemd-git

2024-01-13 Thread dreieck
Dear MarsSeed, On Sat, 30 Dec 2023 10:22:23 +, MarsSeed via not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: > AUR packages have to be compatible with Arch Linux. > This isn't: its dependency elogind is not installable > due to conflicting with core/filesystem and core/systemd. Can you please provide me the

Re: [PRQ#52112] Deletion Request for tea4cups-svn

2023-12-11 Thread dreieck
On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 14:02:35 +0100, Marcell Meszaros wrote: > I think you wanted to say that it is problematic Python2 (not > Python3) packages that this depends on. :) Yes, you are correct. pgpgGULCAAGtP.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#31732] Deletion Request for gst-plugins-rs

2022-01-29 Thread dreieck via aur-requests
I hereby withdraw my deletion request because I just oversaw that in `prepare()` a specific version gets checked out. On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:04:20 +, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote about "[PRQ#31732] Deletion Request for gst-plugins-rs": > dreieck [1] filed a deletion re

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#31218] Orphan Request for rezound-svn

2022-01-25 Thread dreieck via aur-requests
I have already noted in the pinned comment > This package is now superseded by rezound-git, see > [this comment](/packages/rezound-git/#comment-779933). > > rezound-svn will be marked as outdated and will stay outdated. So outdated for a long time is intentional. However, I now have submitted a

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#31415] Deletion Request for minizip2-2.3.3

2022-01-18 Thread dreieck via aur-requests
I have updated the package to the new location, old version minizip 2.3.3 is still available. There was some package that needs this (specific) old version of minizip for compatibility, that's the reason why I made it. On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:32:07 +, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote about "[P

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#26956] Deletion Request for libsystemd-provides

2021-07-14 Thread dreieck via aur-requests
On Thu, 08 Jul 2021 20:02:05 +, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote about "[PRQ#26956] Deletion Request for libsystemd-provides": > Dummy pkgbuild which depends on systemd-libs and provide libsystemd, > which is already done by systemd-libs in [Core] This is especially for Artix Linux, where 'libs

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#26871] Deletion Request for idos-timetable-data-chaps-trains-europe-2016-latest

2021-07-04 Thread dreieck via aur-requests
wanting to look at historical timetable data). I will add up to date timetable package soon. On Sun, 04 Jul 2021 12:00:41 +, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote about "[PRQ#26871] Deletion Request for idos-timetable-data-chaps-trains-europe-2016-latest": > dreieck [1] filed a del