Yes, I'm aware bitwarden is in the extra repo. However, it sometimes takes
days, weeks or months before our friendly Arch PM has time to update it.
Building it from source is not such an easy task. I helped out libertylocked
(original AUR maintainer) with it before it was imported into the Arc
@xiota: Ah, you're right.
Sorry, I was thinking it was something else. I'll cancel the request.
On Sunday, August 25th, 2024 at 7:58 PM, xiota wrote:
> `fvm-sourcebuild` is not a duplicate of `fvm` because it builds
> flutter from source. While I do not use the package myself, it does
> satisf
the community?
>
> (Sorry for sending this email again. Used Reply To before.)
>
> --greg
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 10:48 PM Mark Wagie wrote:
>
>> Oh, sorry. You're right, 'just pack' does call build before zipping the
>> extension.
>>
&g
the non-git version of the aur package
> and seem to be confused about what happens in the git version. Maybe you
> flagged a wrong package?
>
> I still don't see a valid reason to delete any of them. Granted we fix the
> version you seem to have an issue with.
>
> On Thu,
Greg:
There is no "prebuild". Running 'just pack' only zips the files.
Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.
On Thursday, May 23rd, 2024 at 1:35 PM, Grzegorz Kozub
wrote:
> Hi there! I maintain both AUR packages based on
> https://github.com/flexagoon/rounded-window-corne
If it wasn't finished yet, then you should not have pushed it until it was.
Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.
On Tuesday, January 2nd, 2024 at 7:00 PM, Yue Liu wrote:
> Sorry for the delay. I was having some issue syncing commits from official
> gtk4 package to this one
Using /usr/local/ instead isn't any better. You did notice that's also a
directory that should never be used, right?
If dependencies are missing from the repos or AUR, add them to the AUR and do
it right, please.
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
On Sunday, December 17th, 2023 at 2:27 PM
No, nothing has changed with Nemo since 2018. Obviously the package still
works
/s
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
On Sunday, December 3rd, 2023 at 1:51 PM, not...@aur.archlinux.org
wrote:
> Request #49829 has been Rejected by muflone [1]:
>
> not a single comment explaining th
@Daulphin: Upstream does not support ARM64. This is no reason to request the
package to be deleted.
Please go to The Requests tab (https://aur.archlinux.org/requests) and close
this request.
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
On Saturday, November 11th, 2023 at 7:54 AM, not...@aur.archlin
merge request makes no sense, as the translation patch has to be updated
> as upstream sends new commits.
>
> Upstream doesn't support translations, so I hope the packages don't get
> merged.
>
> On Jul 30 2023, at 12:52 pm, Mark Wagie wrote:
>
>> Actually, it
Actually, it would be better to submit an upstream Pull Request instead.
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Sunday, July 30th, 2023 at 9:48 AM, not...@aur.archlinux.org
wrote:
> yochananmarqos [1] filed a request to merge spectre-meltdown-checker-
> pt
@MarsSeed:
I didn't know the history, thanks for filling me in.
However, this is not a closed source application. Did you see FabioLolix's
comment? The source is here: https://github.com/gamejolt/gamejolt
I submitted the deletion request now knowing that it could take weeks to even
be seen. He
Yes, you're right. Notice I rejected my deletion request before you replied. ;)
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Thursday, June 29th, 2023 at 2:08 PM, Marcell Meszaros
wrote:
> @yochananmarqos, this deletion request is based on mistaken assumptions.
That's weird. I initially chose merge request and chose loupe-git to merge
loupe into, but then changed my mind and created a deletion request instead.
Aurweb didn't like that, I guess?
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Friday, June 23rd, 2023 at 1:21 PM
--- Original Message ---
On Saturday, May 27th, 2023 at 7:58 PM, é wrote:
> May 27, 2023 16:32:31 Mark Wagie mark.wa...@proton.me:
>
> > @serebit: It would help if you actually add it to the extra repo before
> > deleting it.
> >
> > Also, I do not
@serebit: It would help if you actually add it to the extra repo before
deleting it.
Also, I do not appreciate you sloppifying the PKGBUILD and ignoring VCS package
guidelines for submodules. I spent a lot of time on this package doing it right.
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
--- Or
font-awesome has been in the community repo for years:
https://archlinux.org/packages/community/any/font-awesome/
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Monday, March 20th, 2023 at 7:48 PM, Anirudh Konduru
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There doesn't seem to be a ttf-
can try yourself.
>
> Original Message
> On Mar 14, 2023, 3:45 AM, Mark Wagie < mark.wa...@proton.me> wrote:
>
>> That shouldn't be happening. There's nothing in the postman-bin
>> [PKGBUILD](https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?
e been doing that for a long time and everytime package get
> updated original takes over and I have to reinstall and update the desktop
> cache.
>
> Original Message ----
> On Mar 14, 2023, 3:36 AM, Mark Wagie < mark.wa...@proton.me> wrote:
>
>> C
Copy the desktop file from /usr/share/applications/ to
~/.local/share/applications/ and modify it there.
Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Monday, March 13th, 2023 at 3:45 PM, Debendra Oli
wrote:
> Sure, what do you suggest; delete?
20 matches
Mail list logo
