Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#37188] Orphan Request for nvidia-vulkan

On 30/08/2022 20:57, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: jonathon [1] filed an orphan request for nvidia-vulkan [2]: Package has been flagged out-of-date for several weeks and is now multiple versions behind upstream. My intention is to adopt, update, and re-add the original maintainer as co-mainta

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#35340] Deletion Request for mutter-rounded

On 13/06/2022 16:38, notify--- via aur-requests wrote: > Giovanni62 [1] filed a deletion request for mutter-rounded [2]: ... > [455/1174] Linking target cogl/tests/conform/test-conformance > ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed. > ==> ERRORE: Si è verificato un errore in build(). "By submittin

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#35051] Deletion Request for lyx

On 03/06/2022 15:22, notify--- via aur-requests wrote: wuddy [1] filed a deletion request for lyx [2]: meet an error when I install. How can I i fix it This is not what a deletion request is for. [code] ./autogen.sh: line 86: make: command not found Building po/POTFILES.in failed -- abortin

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#34803] Deletion Request for osc

On 25/05/2022 11:44, Yurii Kolesnykov wrote: 25 трав. 2022 р. о 13:24 Jonathon Fernyhough написав(ла): On 24/05/2022 20:57, notify--- via aur-requests wrote: yurikoles [1] filed a deletion request for osc [2]: OOD for 1.5 months. Generally an orphan request would be more appropriate, assumi

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#34803] Deletion Request for osc

On 24/05/2022 20:57, notify--- via aur-requests wrote: yurikoles [1] filed a deletion request for osc [2]: OOD for 1.5 months. Generally an orphan request would be more appropriate, assuming you want to update the package yourself. Otherwise, filing a deletion request is possibly a little p

Re: [aur-requests] Unable to create AUR

On 22/05/2022 01:38, Luke via aur-requests wrote: git clone git+ssh://a...@aur.archlinux.org/repeaterSTART.git ... > git push --set-upstream repeaterSTART master You might want to read through the wiki page again: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines#Creating_package_repo

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#34638] Deletion Request for ivpn-ui

On 19/05/2022 20:06, Jonathon Fernyhough via aur-requests wrote: On 15/05/2022 08:51, notify--- via aur-requests wrote: garlicbreadwolfs [1] filed a deletion request for ivpn-ui [2]: prepare() requires root privileges, which is a security problem. A better approach might be to leave a

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#34638] Deletion Request for ivpn-ui

On 15/05/2022 08:51, notify--- via aur-requests wrote: garlicbreadwolfs [1] filed a deletion request for ivpn-ui [2]: prepare() requires root privileges, which is a security problem. A better approach might be to leave a comment for the maintainer to read on the package page, so I have added

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#34542] Orphan Request for timeshift

On 08/05/2022 10:06, notify--- via aur-requests wrote: Golum [1] filed an orphan request for timeshift [2]: Pls.can you update or fix it. Snapshots which made in rsync are not showing in the GUI but they are made. I think because of this https://github.com/teejee2008/timeshift/issues/891 [1] ht

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#34105] Deletion Request for linux-lts44

On 17/04/2022 18:03, notify--- via aur-requests wrote: severach [1] filed a deletion request for linux-lts44 [2]: Delisted from kernel.org. This is still seeing maintenance from CIP and can be updated to use that as the upstream source. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/li

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#33639] Orphan Request for libpamac-full

On 30/03/2022 18:04, notify--- via aur-requests wrote: the current maintainer has not updated so it does not work. You're listed as a co-maintainer so you already have the ability to make changes to the package? OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#33525] Orphan Request for gnome-internet-radio-locator

It sounds like this should be a merge request rather than an orphan request (i.e. merge gnome-internet-radio-locator into gnome-radio)? On 25/03/2022 17:55, Luna Jernberg via aur-requests wrote: Can add you as a co-maintainer if you want? On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 6:54 PM Luna Jernberg

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#33466] Merge Request for firefox-esr-i18n

On 23/03/2022 09:32, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: jonathon [1] filed a request to merge firefox-esr-i18n [2] into firefox-esr [3]: This can be maintained as a split package and so easily kept in sync. Prep work for i18n packages is done, https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/commit/?h=fi

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#33442] Orphan Request for firefox-esr

On 22/03/2022 16:28, notify--- via aur-requests wrote: dudemanguy [1] filed an orphan request for firefox-esr [2]: Maintainer has not updated this package for roughly two weeks now and is two version behind upstream. I've just been added as co-maintainer; if you have a PKGBUILD diff ready le

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#31497] Deletion Request for anbox-modules-dkms

On 15/01/2022 19:00, Sick Codes via aur-requests wrote: anbox-modules-dkms follows last working commit with the patch for 5.10 anbox-modules-dkms-git follows master branch with sed instead of a patch As of [1], anbox-modules-dkms is pinned to upstream commits. It is therefore not a VCS packa

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#31301] Deletion Request for backintime

On 05/01/2022 14:27, notify--- via aur-requests wrote: amedTheBear [1] filed a deletion request for backintime [2]: building with makepkg, this appens: an 18 tests in 4.471s OK (skipped=9) python -m unittest -b test/test_tools.py .s...s..s..s..Fs.s...ss...s.

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#31280] Deletion Request for nvidia-390xx-utils

On 04/01/2022 21:42, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: MarcoIs [1] filed a deletion request for nvidia-390xx-utils [2]: nvidia-390xx-utils (master:#) makepkg -cisR ==> Erstelle Paket: nvidia-390xx-utils 390.147-1 (Di 04 Jan 2022 22:29:26 CET) ==> Prüfe Laufzeit-Abhängigkeiten... ==> Prüfe Buildtim

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#30865] Orphan Request for foundryvtt

On 18/12/2021 12:52, notify--- via aur-requests wrote: wereii [1] filed an orphan request for foundryvtt [2]: Updates ignored by current maintainer. This request is invalid. Package was updated today. OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#28791] Deletion Request for palemoon-bin

On 19/10/2021 07:14, Иван Архипов wrote: Well, if you look here , you can see that this is a little wrong, I'm not sure what a Manjaro PKGBUILD has to do with something on the AUR? Or are you saying that the M

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#28791] Deletion Request for palemoon-bin

On 18/10/2021 04:04, notify--- via aur-requests wrote: naruto522ru [1] filed a deletion request for palemoon-bin [2]: Doesn't match the rules. Errors in PKGBUILD. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/naruto522ru/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/palemoon-bin/ From the comments page I c

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#28775] Orphan Request for icecat

On 17/10/2021 00:42, notify--- via aur-requests wrote: Ningen [1] filed an orphan request for icecat [2]: Icecat, being FSF endorsed, should really be a standard package available to all ArchLinux users as it is privacy oriented and has overlap in interests of general ArchLinux users. Currently,

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#28572] Orphan Request for isl

On 02/10/2021 08:18, notify--- via aur-requests wrote: AlexBocken [1] filed an orphan request for isl [2]: Maintainer does not update source to a server that is up. Maybe give the maintainer more than an hour after commenting before requesting the package to be Orphaned? This request shoul