On 27.07.21 10:55, Caleb Maclennan wrote:
On 2021-07-25 16:14, Jake via aur-requests wrote:
Apparently a package that I regularly maintained for over 3 years and
was the most popular Octoprint package is not even worth a comment
before wiping out. I am extremely disappointed by that reaction
On 26.07.21 14:17, Chih-Hsuan Yen wrote:
On Tue Jun 29 09:15:31 UTC 2021, Jake wrote:
If you dislike the general approach of using a venv then just
contribute/patch the already existing 'octoprint' (no suffix) package to
remove the venv there. Keep in mind that this would break often on
depende
Apparently a package that I regularly maintained for over 3 years and
was the most popular Octoprint package is not even worth a comment
before wiping out. I am extremely disappointed by that reaction!
Now only the 'octoprint' package is left, with the sloppy maintainer
that takes multiple mon
On 28.06.21 20:08, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
Repentinus [1] filed a deletion request for octoprint-venv [2]:
Installs octoprint into a venv instead of the appropriate FHS
location. Should be fixed and uploaded as octoprint.
The package installs into /opt, which is the appropriate FHS loc
