Re: [PRQ#74760] Orphan Request for cinnamon-desktop-git

Il 22/07/25 02:58, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: matthewq337 [1] filed an orphan request for cinnamon-desktop-git [2]: Flagged out-of-date (2024-03-22) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/matthewq337/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/cinnamon-desktop-git/ Are you going to adopt

Re: [PRQ#74748] Orphan Request for zathura-git

Il 21/07/25 18:19, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: bana [1] filed an orphan request for zathura-git [2]: Please consider handing over the package to active maintainer [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/bana/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/zathura-git/ The package is not flagged

Re: [PRQ#74643] Orphan Request for q2rtx-git

Il 18/07/25 19:35, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: Sid127 [1] filed an orphan request for q2rtx-git [2]: improper pkgbuild, uses tagged release on a -git package [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Sid127/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/q2rtx-git/ This don't use tagged releases

Re: [PRQ#74371] Deletion Request for lib32-libbs2b

Il 04/07/25 06:34, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: AsukaMinato [1] filed a deletion request for lib32-libbs2b [2]: https://cfhcable.dl.sourceforge.net/project/bs2b/libbs2b/3.1.0/libbs2b-3.1.0.tar.gz is no longer avaiable [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/AsukaMinato/ [2] https://aur.a

Re: [PRQ#74367] Deletion Request for segfault

Il 03/07/25 17:58, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: oech3 [1] filed a deletion request for segfault [2]: Use case of this is covered by Extra/stress-ng . Also this operation should not called by shell completion accidently. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/oech3/ [2] https://aur.archli

Re: [PRQ#74182] Deletion Request for hyprtiler

Il 23/06/25 16:17, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: Antrax [1] filed a deletion request for hyprtiler [2]: Please i will remove everything hyprland related because hyprland now is not free software, no more. I switch to niri. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Antrax/ [2] https://aur.arc

Re: [PRQ#73566] Deletion Request for xbrightness

Il 26/05/25 20:18, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: oech3 [1] filed a deletion request for xbrightness [2]: rm -f xbrightness gcc -o xbrightness -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing xbrightness.o -lXxf86vm -lXaw -lXmu -lXt -lSM -lICE -lXpm -lXext -lX11 -lm /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXaw: No

Re: [PRQ#73330] Orphan Request for mir

Il 15/05/25 10:41, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: sudopluto [1] filed an orphan request for mir [2]: Maintainer has let package become outdated again, does not accept PRs on github to update pkgbuilds [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/sudopluto/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/m

Re: [PRQ#73289] Orphan Request for nbfc-linux

luftwaffle [1] filed an orphan request for nbfc-linux [2]: The maintainer has given me permission to submit an orphan request. I will either adopt this package myself or find someone else who is willing to. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/luftwaffle/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/n

Re: [PRQ#73064] Merge Request for rlvm-git

Il 03/05/25 01:15, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: neeshy [1] filed a request to merge rlvm-git [2] into rlvm [3]: Upstream hasn't made a release in over 10 years so both rlvm and rlvm- git are forced to build from master. There's no reason for the -git version of the package. [1] https://

Re: [PRQ#72544] Deletion Request for plex-media-player

Il 22/04/25 14:29, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: ombre [1] filed a deletion request for plex-media-player [2]: Upstream is dead, plex-desktop seems to be alive [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ombre/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/plex-media-player/ Can be easily fixed with

Re: [PRQ#72366] Deletion Request for electron33-bin

oech3 [1] filed a deletion request for electron33-bin [2]: In Extra repo. Similar for 34-bin 35-bin . Comment of submitter: If the electron33 package is removed from the extra repo, would anyone be willing to spend a few hours and download dozens of gigabytes files to compile electron33? [1] ht

Re: [PRQ#71406] Orphan Request for alexandrie-pg

Il 29/03/25 14:41, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: ussur [1] filed an orphan request for alexandrie-pg [2]: Maintainer action needed. This package no longer builds on rust 1.80 onwards. `PKGBUILD` has this function: ``` prepare() { export RUSTUP_TOOLCHAIN=stable } ``` It explicitly se

Re: [PRQ#70475] Deletion Request for insight-toolkit

Il 01/03/25 22:17, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: lahwaacz [1] filed a deletion request for insight-toolkit [2]: Provided by itk in extra: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/itk [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/lahwaacz/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/in

Re: [PRQ#70946] Deletion Request for crc

Il 09/03/25 11:17, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: pfeifferj [1] filed a deletion request for crc [2]: duplicate crc-git [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/pfeifferj/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/crc/ crc isn't a duplicate of crc-git, it is just cheking out a fixed with git s

Re: [PRQ#70929] Deletion Request for vapoursynth-plugin-vsffdnet-git

Il 09/03/25 01:29, sL1pKn07 SpinFlo ha scritto: El sáb, 8 mar 2025 a las 17:33, > escribió: sl1pkn07 [1] filed a deletion request for vapoursynth-plugin-vsffdnet- git [2]: gone [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/sl1pkn07/ [2] https://

Re: [PRQ#70248] Deletion Request for package-installer-xe

Il 24/02/25 14:45, محمود المظالي ha scritto: I was not aware of the policies followed in the community.  For your information, the package is safe. Hosted by gitlab You have been informed multiple times of the issues of your pkgbuilds (though most with deletetion request) to which you haven't r

Re: [PRQ#69839] Orphan Request for brave-bin

Il 13/02/25 16:40, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: brave [1] filed an orphan request for brave-bin [2]: The Brave DevOps team would like to take over the brave-bin package, following the recent adoption of brave-beta-bin and brave-nightly-bin. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/brave/ [

Re: [PRQ#69620] Orphan Request for batfetch

dreieck [1] filed an orphan request for batfetch [2]: This package is a `-git` package but not named accordingly. Comment was made already in 2023, but issue not fixed yet by the maintainer. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/dreieck/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/batfetch/ There a

Re: [PRQ#68638] Orphan Request for supertux-advance

Il 20/01/25 17:28, Tulpenkiste ha scritto: Hello, The maintainer has responded and granted me co-maintainer status. As a result, I would like to withdraw the request as its just not needed any longer. Best Regards, Tulpenkiste On 16.01.25 17:09, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: tulpenkiste [

Re: [PRQ#68493] Deletion Request for cider2-bin

KarmaTag [1] filed a deletion request for cider2-bin [2]: This package is bundling software which requires payment. In essence, it is pirated. See https://cider.sh/downloads/client [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/KarmaTag/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/cider2-bin/ This pkgbuild

Re: [PRQ#68269] Deletion Request for ufw-icon-bar

Il 03/01/25 13:37, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: adamperkowski [1] filed a deletion request for ufw-icon-bar [2]: this should be ufw-icon-bar-git [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/adamperkowski/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ufw-icon-bar/ This one build a fixed commit, the

Re: [PRQ#68255] Orphan Request for davinci-resolve

Il 02/01/25 19:35, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: MatthieuDev [1] filed an orphan request for davinci-resolve [2]: Not updated for 2 months [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MatthieuDev/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/davinci-resolve/ An orphan request is already pending, whi

Re: [PRQ#68206] Orphan Request for daytona

Il 31/12/24 13:37, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: ivlev.dev [1] filed an orphan request for daytona [2]: Is package is not updated long time [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ivlev.dev/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/daytona/ Context: so far daytona have been a one time effor

Re: [PRQ#68050] Deletion Request for maui-bonsai-git

Il 28/12/24 15:25, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: FabioLolix [1] filed a deletion request for maui-bonsai-git [2]: Not compatible with Mauikit 4/Qt6, last touched upstream on 2024/02 (don't get fooled by the 'Script Kiddy' bot) and no ETA for porting https://invent.kde.org/maui/bonsai/-/c

Re: [PRQ#68019] Deletion Request for xz-git

envolution [1] filed a deletion request for xz-git [2]: This was originally submitted since core xz did not support parallel compression, that has been added to core - this package is not serving any purpose not covered by core [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/envolution/ [2] https://aur.ar

Re: [PRQ#67792] Deletion Request for com.qq.browser

Il 24/12/24 13:10, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: Lapis_Apple [1] filed a deletion request for com.qq.browser [2]: useless [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Lapis_Apple/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/com.qq.browser/ Missing context: com.qq.browser is a one time effort on 202

Re: [PRQ#67761] Orphan Request for davinci-resolve

psygreg [1] filed an orphan request for davinci-resolve [2]: The package has been outdated for over a month. I offer myself to maintain it. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/psygreg/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/davinci-resolve/ An orphan request is already pending, while you can'

Re: [PRQ#67584] Merge Request for dbeaver-ce-latest

witt.9099 [1] filed a request to merge dbeaver-ce-latest [2] into dbeaver-ce-bin [3]: The dbeaver-ce-bin package has not been responded to for a long time and has expired. Please merge it into dbeaver-ce-bin and maintain it by me. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/witt.9099/ [2] https://aur.

Re: [PRQ#67512] Deletion Request for davinci-resolve

compsciwins [1] filed a deletion request for davinci-resolve [2]: Issue with the PKG build and an new update has been release please update that [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/compsciwins/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/davinci-resolve/ Deletion requests are not for asking update

Re: [PRQ#67440] Deletion Request for mplayer-gui-svn

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for mplayer-gui-svn [2]: Not a VCS package: uses a fixed svn revision as source. Pls kindly resubmit with the pkgname 'mplayer-gui'. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/mplayer-gui-svn/ You can get in touc

Re: [PRQ#67378] Orphan Request for cgterm

Il 15/12/24 16:09, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: bittin [1] filed an orphan request for cgterm [2]: nevermind, took over the package myself and fixed it [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/bittin/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/cgterm/ Hi bittin, regarding [PRQ#67377]; orphan

Re: [PRQ#67315] Deletion Request for gtk-sharp-2-git

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for gtk-sharp-2-git [2]: Obsolete. Upstream repo is archived since Oct 1, 2024. Also the used branch, 'gtk-sharp-2-12-branch', has not been maintained for 3 years. [a] Arch extra repo still carries the last stable release. [b] [a]: https://github.com/mono/g

Re: [PRQ#66079] Deletion Request for libsde-utils-jansson-git

Il 21/11/24 05:20, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for libsde-utils-jansson-git [2]: Unused, broken library VCS package from 2017. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/libsde-utils-jansson-git/ +1 for

Re: [PRQ#67089] Deletion Request for drawio-bin

Il 05/12/24 05:09, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: zxp19821005 [1] filed a deletion request for drawio-bin [2]: `drawio-desktop` already in the `extra` repo. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/zxp19821005/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/drawio-bin/ This isn't the desktop versio

Re: [PRQ#66320] Merge Request for diablo-project-manager

Il 22/11/24 22:36, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: MarsSeed [1] filed a request to merge diablo-project-manager [2] into diablo-project-manager-git [3]: Duplicate packages. Both are VCS builds, using a git repo's branch. The '-git' pkgname suffix is mandatory for such packages. Please fami

Re: [PRQ#66740] Orphan Request for bambustudio-bin

Il 28/11/24 06:22, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: JoveYu [1] filed an orphan request for bambustudio-bin [2]: package should update for new release version [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/JoveYu/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/bambustudio-bin/ It has been updated last time

Re: [PRQ#65999] Deletion Request for dbeaver-ce-latest

Il 19/11/24 18:09, Tiago Peralta ha scritto: ce-bin is not last stable rev, nor ce. Just forked and updated, but feel free to delete if needed On Tue, Nov 19, 2024, 16:39 > wrote: FabioLolix [1] filed a deletion request for dbeaver-ce-latest [2]: Dupl

Re: [PRQ#65646] Deletion Request for youtube-downloader-bin

Il 12/11/24 22:54, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: schinfo [1] filed a deletion request for youtube-downloader-bin [2]: Please do not delete the package. I found a solution and the build works again. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/schinfo/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/youtu

Re: [PRQ#65060] Orphan Request for tpi Rejected

Il 10/11/24 02:51, Muflone ha scritto: Request #65060 has been Rejected by Muflone [1]: the package was updated [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/ Repeating myself from 10/05 The pkgbuild have bumped version but now is a disguised -bin one I have posted a revisioned pkgbuild on

Re: [PRQ#65060] Orphan Request for tpi Rejected

Il 10/11/24 00:03, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: Request #65060 has been Rejected by Muflone [1]: the package was updated [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/ Repeating myself from 10/05 The pkgbuild have bumped version but now is a disguised -bin one I have posted a revisi

Re: [PRQ#65060] Orphan Request for tpi

Il 29/10/24 15:33, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: Sacro [1] filed an orphan request for tpi [2]: Not been updated to respond to comments [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Sacro/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/tpi/ The pkgbuild have bumped version but now is a disguised -bin o

Re: [PRQ#65108] Orphan Request for dwl

Il 30/10/24 17:30, Fabio Loli ha scritto: Il 30/10/24 17:18, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: thule [1] filed an orphan request for dwl [2]: I tried to contact the developer with not answer. I would like to step up as maintainer of this package since I use it every day. [1] https

Re: [PRQ#65109] Orphan Request for dwl-git

Il 30/10/24 17:19, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: thule [1] filed an orphan request for dwl-git [2]: I tried to contact the maintainer of this package without luck. I would like to step up as a maintainer of this package since I use it every day. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/thul

Re: [PRQ#65108] Orphan Request for dwl

Il 30/10/24 17:18, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: thule [1] filed an orphan request for dwl [2]: I tried to contact the developer with not answer. I would like to step up as maintainer of this package since I use it every day. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/thule/ [2] https://aur.a

Re: [PRQ#64637] Orphan Request for julius-game-git

thule [1] filed an orphan request for julius-game-git [2]: This package was not updated in 3 years and the original maintainer does not reply to email. I would like to step in as a maintainer. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/thule/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/julius-game-git/ T

Re: [PRQ#64421] Deletion Request for morewaita-icon-theme-git

Muflone [1] filed a deletion request for morewaita-icon-theme-git [2]: duplicate of morewaita-git [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/morewaita-icon-theme-git/ This can be rejected since morewaita-git have been merged into morewaita-icon-theme-g

Re: [PRQ#64317] Deletion Request for neovim-nonicons-git Accepted

Request #64317 has been Accepted by Antiz [1]: [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for neovim-nonicons-git. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Antiz/ Why this has been accepted? Not having a license is not an issue for AUR In the archwiki there was written to use `unkown` if license wasn't k

Re: [PRQ#64317] Deletion Request for neovim-nonicons-git

dreieck [1] filed a deletion request for neovim-nonicons-git [2]: Upstream has no license, so this package must not exist. See https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=2202042#p2202042 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/dreieck/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/neovim-nonicons-git/

Re: [PRQ#64214] Deletion Request for input-leap-git

luciferin [1] filed a deletion request for input-leap-git [2]: Package no longer has any use, all changes have been accepted upstream to input-leap-git [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/luciferin/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/input-leap-git/ This is input-leap-git, please revoke y

Re: [PRQ#64202] Orphan Request for zfs-linux Rejected

Hello, Just a clarification, the request was the same for multiple packages all part of the same group "ArchZFS" with different purposes (std, zen, lts, etc), all under the same developer who hasn't responded in quite some time. Hence the multiple requests that were effectively the same. Tha

Re: [PRQ#64223] Deletion Request for docker-compose-git

leandrocunha [1] filed a deletion request for docker-compose-git [2]: A orphaned package with unmaintained code from docker compose v1 should be removed as no one will want to move to docker compose v2 made in go. The use of this package is not recommended by upstream and recommends upgrading to

Re: Weird Package

im trying to submit a 'migrate-bin' package which already exists but at the same time does not... how is it possible? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/migrate-bin https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=migrate-bin Hello, pkgbuilds git repositories aren't really deleted; just

Re: [PRQ#64067] Deletion Request for python-pygccxml

carsme [1] filed a deletion request for python-pygccxml [2]: Moved to [extra]: https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/python- pygccxml/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/carsme/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-pygccxml/ btw that package have several problems running tests h

Re: [PRQ#64043] Deletion Request for shntool

Archttila [1] filed a deletion request for shntool [2]: dead project [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Archttila/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/shntool/ Still build, is required by other 7 pkgbuilds

Re: gnome-radio 47 PKGBUILD

Il 21/09/24 08:54, Luna Jernberg ha scritto: Hey! Feel like pushing to the AUR: https://pastebin.com/bG9kiR3g for gnome-radio so it will get the 47 version? or add me back as one of the maintainer i did Disown the package last month when Ole stepped down, but now he is back at it again Hi, fla

Re: [PRQ#63811] Orphan Request for pacwrap

This is required to prevent conflict with the -git package. Best regards, Xavier On 9/15/24 03:36, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: matthewq337 [1] filed an orphan request for pacwrap [2]: does not conflict with it's self [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/matthewq337/ [2] https://aur.arch

Re: [PRQ#62745] Deletion Request for lib32-avahi Accepted

Request #62745 has been Accepted by bertptrs [1]: That's not a reason for deletion. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/bertptrs/ btw you have accepted the deletion request, same for precedent request of multimc5

Re: [PRQ#62876] Orphan Request for bun-bin

terrablue [1] filed an orphan request for bun-bin [2]: Hi, are you still regularly updating this package? bun regularly releases, and I rely on that, so I'd be happy to take over if you're willing. Best terrablue [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/terrablue/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pk

Re: [PRQ#62810] Deletion Request for android-sdk-debian

micwoj92 [1] filed a deletion request for android-sdk-debian [2]: This is essentially the same as android-sdk package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/micwoj92/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/android-sdk-debian/ Yes, in addition This is a one time effort on 2022-10-28 Flagged OO

Re: [PRQ#62416] Deletion Request for quiterss-git

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for quiterss-git [2]: It seems this has become obsolete because it depends on the increasingly more frequently breaking component qt5-webkit, EOL since 2017. As of now, all providers of that lib, the qt5-webkit, qt5-webkit-git, qt5-webkit-movableink-git AUR

Re: [PRQ#62415] Deletion Request for deadbeef-qt5-git

begin-theadventu [1] filed a deletion request for deadbeef-qt5-git [2]: There's a working fork of the same project https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/deadbeef-qt5-git#comment-977674 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/begin-theadventu/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/deadbeef-qt5-git/

Re: [PRQ#61840] Orphan Request for godot-cpp

tonitch [1] filed an orphan request for godot-cpp [2]: Godot 4.2.2 has been released 5 month ago and extra/godot is on 4.2.2 so this mean this package isn't compatible and should be updated. I request orphan because this package has been flagged out of date for quite some time now. your pkgbuild

Re: [PRQ#61773] Orphan Request for linuxcnc

GPereira [1] filed an orphan request for linuxcnc [2]: Outdated for a while. I use this software every week I am interested in maintaining it [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/GPereira/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/linuxcnc/ pkgbuild is updated, as said on 2024-04-29 GPereira is w

Re: [PRQ#61749] Orphan Request for tencent-docs-bin

springkill [1] filed an orphan request for tencent-docs-bin [2]: I'll take this [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/springkill/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/tencent-docs-bin/ Hostile or without reason orphan requests are not welcome

Re: [PRQ#61603] Deletion Request for aqsis

micwoj92 [1] filed a deletion request for aqsis [2]: Build fails, upstream dead with no realease in last 10+ years. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/micwoj92/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/aqsis/ Confirming that stable release is broken beyond repair, this was dropped even by Debi

Re: [PRQ#61114] Orphan Request for libwacom-surface

sirus20x6 [1] filed an orphan request for libwacom-surface [2]: Compiler for C supports arguments -Wmissing-declarations: YES Did not find pkg-config by name 'pkg-config' Found pkg-config: NO Did not find CMake 'cmake' Found CMake: NO Run-time dependency gudev-1.0 found: NO libwacom/meson.build:

Re: [PRQ#61075] Merge Request for xmcl-launcher

v1mkss [1] filed a request to merge xmcl-launcher [2] into xmcl- minecraft [3]: I want to work on this launcher and its updates for a while [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/v1mkss/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/xmcl-launcher/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/xmcl-minecraft/ '

Re: [PRQ#61012] Deletion Request for arduino1 Rejected

Request #61012 has been Rejected by Antiz [1]: A merge request is simply a deletion request with the extra step of merging the votes and comments of the "old" package into the "new" targeted one. When there's nothing relevant to merge (or nothing at all, like it's the case here), there's no reaso

Re: [PRQ#60023] Deletion Request for amarok

mackel [1] filed a deletion request for amarok [2]: Now the Castaway version was updated. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/mackel/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/amarok/ deletion requests are not intented for this an orphan one is pending Please go https://aur.archlinux.org/reque

Re: [PRQ#59870] Orphan Request for quickemu-git

nikarh [1] filed an orphan request for quickemu-git [2]: The package does not build for almost a year, please either update the PKGBUILD or orphan the package [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/nikarh/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/quickemu-git/ Adopted and made a first revision, at

Re: [PRQ#59658] Deletion Request for rustic-bin

AlphaJack [1] filed a deletion request for rustic-bin [2]: Package is now available as [extra]/rustic [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/AlphaJack/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/rustic-bin/ A deletion request is already pending, [PRQ#59583], submitted yesterday

Re: [PRQ#59466] Orphan Request for midori-bin

Il 23/04/24 00:38, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: lluisparcet [1] filed an orphan request for midori-bin [2]: I try to install midori-bin and I receive an error on the package download website: Error downloading https://astian.org/wp- content/uploads/midori-browser/linux/midori_11.2.2_amd6

Re: [PRQ#59232] Orphan Request for iscan

Pafrape [1] filed an orphan request for iscan [2]: Erreur : Impossible de télécharger le logiciel [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Pafrape/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/iscan/ Please disregard, inappropriate request. This should have been a comment in english on AURweb Fun fact

Re: [PRQ#58633] Orphan Request for android-file-transfer-linux-git

Il 01/04/24 19:27, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: MartinVonReich [1] filed an orphan request for android-file-transfer- linux-git [2]: Hello there, I can take over this package as I already maintain the non-GIT variant: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/android-file-transfer-linux Thank

Re: [PRQ#57904] Merge Request for eclipse-cpp-bin

altermetax [1] filed a request to merge eclipse-cpp-bin [2] into eclipse-cpp [3]: - The eclipse-cpp-bin package seems unmaintained - Both eclipse-cpp and eclipse-cpp-bin create the package from pre- built artifacts, however as per the AUR submission guidelines Java software shouldn't have the -bi

Re: [PRQ#57846] Deletion Request for libpamac-aur

paulgureghian [1] filed a deletion request for libpamac-aur [2]: Are you going to update this soon? [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/paulgureghian/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/libpamac-aur/ Deletion requests are not made for prompting updates You already commented today with:

Re: [PRQ#52687] Deletion Request for skypeforlinux-stable-bin

bulletmark [1] filed a deletion request for skypeforlinux-stable-bin [2]: The upstream package is not produced by Microsoft/Skype anymore. Ref https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/skype/forum/all/skype-for-linux- updates/da864865-d9e9-4819-8a5d-8de8934dd312 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/b

Re: [PRQ#52809] Deletion Request for hqplayer Accepted

On 1/7/24 18:20, Fabio Loli wrote: Request #52809 has been Accepted by Antiz [1]: [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for hqplayer. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Antiz/ Why deleting hqplayer? Typically we update the main pkgbuild to the new version and create other pkgbuilds for legacy

Re: [PRQ#52809] Deletion Request for hqplayer Accepted

Request #52809 has been Accepted by Antiz [1]: [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for hqplayer. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Antiz/ Why deleting hqplayer? Typically we update the main pkgbuild to the new version and create other pkgbuilds for legacy versions Also IMO naming of hqplaye

Re: [PRQ#52620] Orphan Request for beets-git

angelss19 [1] filed an orphan request for beets-git [2]: Please fix the package [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/angelss19/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/beets-git/ Additional context not provided by angelss19, beets-git have an otdated .SRCINFO (python-sphinx is not listed), coul

Re: [PRQ#52498] Deletion Request for hyprland-nvidia

raffaem [1] filed a deletion request for hyprland-nvidia [2]: The nvidia patches are not needed anymore since v 0.33.0 (https://github.com/hyprwm/Hyprland/releases/tag/v0.33.0). This is also outdated (0.31) and should be removed. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/raffaem/ [2] https://aur.ar

Re: [PRQ#52415] Orphan Request for quiterss

edward3 [1] filed an orphan request for quiterss [2]: Hey, can you fix this situation: /usr/bin/ld: warning: libicuuc.so.73, needed by /usr/lib/libQt5WebKit.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /usr/bin/ld: warning: libicui18n.so.73, needed by /usr/lib/libQt5WebKit.so, not found (try u

Re: [PRQ#52406] Orphan Request for blivet-gui

CyberShadow [1] filed an orphan request for blivet-gui [2]: Fails to build in a clean chroot, maintainer unresponsive [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/CyberShadow/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/blivet-gui/ Additional context, python-setuptools is the missing makedepnds and have be

Re: [PRQ#52300] Deletion Request for airgeddon-git

BoBeR182 [1] filed a deletion request for airgeddon-git [2]: As maintainer of this package (airgeddon-git), we were aligned with the "airgeddon" package maintainer. Now we co-maintain it. We decided to leave "airgeddon" package instead of this one. Not needed and it duplicates maintenance effort.

Re: [PRQ#52296] Deletion Request for icu74

dreieck [1] filed a deletion request for icu74 [2]: Now version 74 has made it to the Artix repositories. No need for this package right now; but might be useful as a legacy version later on when official version has moved on. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/dreieck/ [2] https://aur.archli

Re: [PRQ#51358] Deletion Request for obs-studio-git

Il 16/11/23 21:54, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: dhtseany [1] filed a deletion request for obs-studio-git [2]: Duplicate of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hamrs-appimage which has been packaged better than my original work here, no need to keep it. Please remove. [1] https://aur.arch

Re: [PRQ#45927] Deletion Request for midori-git Rejected

Il 15/11/23 10:14, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: Request #45927 has been Rejected by artafinde [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/artafinde/ Midori source is now at https://github.com/goastian/midori-desktop

Re: [PRQ#50362] Merge Request for itk

Il 06/11/23 00:06, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: MarsSeed [1] filed a request to merge itk [2] into insight-toolkit [3]: Eliminating duplication. 'insight-toolkit' has been on AUR for much longer, and also aligns better with Arch package guidelines, which recommend that a package name sh

Re: [PRQ#50346] Deletion Request for psx

Il 05/11/23 17:02, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for psx [2]: Dead foreign-built binary PSX emulator from 2007; source code unavailable as this was closed source. PKGBUILD does not install the needed license (which seems to be unknown/undeclared by au

Re: [PRQ#49904] Deletion Request for csl-git

Il 31/10/23 11:19, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for csl-git [2]: Abandoned, unused developmental VCS package; upstream not maintained since 2014. [a] [a]: https://github.com/piernov/Cube-Server-Lister [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/

Re: [PRQ#49142] Orphan Request for tor-browser-bin

Elrondo46 [1] filed an orphan request for tor-browser-bin [2]: I can maintain it if the author don't want to manage it anymore [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Elrondo46/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/tor-browser-bin/ * it was flagged OOD since only 4 days * you could have asked t

Re: [PRQ#48911] Merge Request for chainner-bin

ShalokShalom [1] filed a request to merge chainner-bin [2] into chainner20-bin [3]: I would continue to maintain this package [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ShalokShalom/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/chainner-bin/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/chainner20-bin/ Merge targ

Re: [PRQ#48762] Orphan Request for zerobrane-studio

ShalokShalom [1] filed an orphan request for zerobrane-studio [2]: I already asked to overtake this package, the maintainer does not react at all. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ShalokShalom/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/zerobrane-studio/ Duplicate request of [PRQ#47884] made b

Re: [PRQ#48900] Orphan Request for clementine

swimm3r [1] filed an orphan request for clementine [2]: Clementine is using older libprotobuf version (is using v23, and 24.3-1 is the latest). clementine: error while loading shared libraries: libprotobuf.so.23: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory [1] https://aur.archlinu

Re: [PRQ#48543] Deletion Request for krita-next-bin

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for krita-next-bin [2]: Abandoned prerelease build from 2022-08. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/krita-next-bin/ Other reason for removal: this is repackaging a user build made with makepkg of krita-nex

Re: [PRQ#48488] Orphan Request for bazelisk

Il 07/10/23 08:14, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: FantasqueX [1] filed an orphan request for bazelisk [2]: The maintainer hasn't responded to OOD flag for two months. I would like to maintain the package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/FantasqueX/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgb

Re: [PRQ#47898] Deletion Request for tor-browser

Il 24/09/23 19:11, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: garlicbreadwolfs [1] filed a deletion request for tor-browser [2]: This package is not built from source, but simply downloads and deploys binaries. The Tor browser is open source. This means that you can build it from source. In keeping wi

Re: [PRQ#47884] Orphan Request for zerobrane-studio

Il 24/09/23 10:28, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: ShalokShalom [1] filed an orphan request for zerobrane-studio [2]: I like to maintain this. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ShalokShalom/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/zerobrane-studio/ It have been flagged out of date only

Re: [PRQ#46951] Deletion Request for soundscrape-git

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for soundscrape-git [2]: Development discontinued since 2020, [a] reported failing to build in 2022-05 in last and only user comment. I think it is best to delete this. [a]: https://github.com/Miserlou/SoundScrape [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Mars

  1   2   3   >