On 11/21/24 9:24 AM, Nicolas Modrzyk wrote:
i mean it is unclear to me what needs to be done.
in the future, for other people it would be nice to pinpoint to the
relevant documentation.
that specific orgami.ok project is a test project, but the whole origami
suite of image/video processing t
On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 11:15:23 +0100
Alfredo Palhares wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am here anot not MIA,
>
> I am still upkeeping the package and these bugs take a while to
> maintain, but the current version builds and deploys.
>
> If you have any notable contributions, please open a request
> https:
On Mon, 13 May 2024 12:19:33 +
not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
> Coelacanthus [1] filed an orphan request for metals [2]:
>
> This package doesn't follow licenses section of Package Guideline and
> RFC 16. I submitted a comment on AUR but received no response or
> update for four months.
>
>
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 21:05:51 +0200
Marcell Meszaros wrote:
> On 18 April 2024 20:45:34 GMT+02:00, Doug Newgard
> wrote:
> >On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 18:37:46 +
> >not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
> >
> >> MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for neovim-symlinks
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 18:37:46 +
not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
> MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for neovim-symlinks [2]:
>
> This shim package is an inferior, less compatible
> duplicate of AUR/neovim-drop-in [a], which
> has existed for much longer than this one.
>
> [a]: https://aur
On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 16:34:28 +0100
Marcell Meszaros wrote:
> >Marcell Meszaros wrote:
> >
> >> Affected are 10 or so AUR packages, none of which have any viable use case
> >> in lib32 at all, and never even had.
> >
> >
> >Really? So you can guarantee that nobody could be using these librari
On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 16:02:40 +0100
Marcell Meszaros wrote:
> Affected are 10 or so AUR packages, none of which have any viable use case in
> lib32 at all, and never even had.
Really? So you can guarantee that nobody could be using these libraries for any
local project? It doesn't matter in the l
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 18:38:14 -0500
Pedro A. López-Valencia wrote:
> To the AUR managers, as the maintainer, I consider this harassment. Thank you.
Consider it whatever you want (nobody cares), but the simple fact is that
they're right, your use of replaces here is completely and totally wrong. R
On Sun, 20 Aug 2023 00:56:19 +
not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
> maravillo [1] filed a deletion request for onedrive [2]:
>
> software abandoned by upstream
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/maravillo/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/onedrive/
Just because software is featur
al problem.
Nothing is broken.
The other package should not be merged into yours, yours should be deleted as a
duplicate. It's also not all that great quality wise anyway, with the serious
misunderstandings of how depends, provides, conflicts, and replaces work.
> El 20/04/2022 a las 8:4
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 14:10:46 +
not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
> ainola [1] filed a deletion request for neovim-symlinks [2]:
>
> This is more appropriately managed via the user shell's
> PATH/configuration.
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ainola/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pk
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 10:52:32 +
notify--- via aur-requests wrote:
> toropisco [1] filed a request to merge vi-vim-symlink [2] into vim-vi
> [3]:
>
> vim-vi is a better maintained package that supports both vim and gvim
> and covers all possible invoking names that emulate original vi
> featur
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 17:01:54 +
notify--- via aur-requests wrote:
> tyjak [1] filed a deletion request for binance-deb [2]:
>
> My package is the same as a newest and better build package "binance-
> electron".
> I will stop support for my package binance-deb, the why I want a
> deletion.
> N
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:45:57 +
notify--- via aur-requests wrote:
> rility [1] filed a deletion request for chromium-widevine [2]:
>
> Scimmia commented on 2020-05-18 23:20
>
> ATTENTION:
>
> This package is no longer needed for Chromium, it can download the
> component itself. With Chromi
On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 22:49:58 +
notify--- via aur-requests wrote:
> alium [1] filed a deletion request for rtl8821ce-dkms [2]:
>
> hi,
> rtl8821ce-dkms use git source (but -git suffix missing) and it is
> practically the same package as
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rtl8821ce-dkms-git/
15 matches
Mail list logo
