This should really be a merge request into the replacement package.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 10:49 PM notify--- via aur-requests <
aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org> wrote:
> dqYpb [1] filed a deletion request for nu1ll1nux [2]:
>
> Package has been renamed.
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/accoun
Dammit, it bodged my first attempt to reply. This stupid app appears to just
load Minecraft classic in an iframe from classic.minecraft.net.
> On Jul 23, 2021, at 10:44 PM, notify--- via aur-requests
> wrote:
>
> kleintux [1] filed a deletion request for minecraft-free-bin [2]:
>
> The PKGBU
> On Jul 23, 2021, at 10:44 PM, notify--- via aur-requests
> wrote:
>
> kleintux [1] filed a deletion request for minecraft-free-bin [2]:
>
> The PKGBUILD is completely wrong.
> The source and licence is shady.
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/kleintux/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux
What about the chaotic-mirrorlist package? That's clearly a mirrorlist file for
an unofficial user repository.
> On Tuesday, May 04, 2021 at 4:06 AM, notify--- via aur-requests
> mailto:aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org)>
> wrote:
> Alad [1] filed a deletion request for chaotic-keyring [2]:
>
>
While we're narcing on Minecraft launchers, may as well look into tlauncher as
well, I hear that one's been on AUR since at least 2015, and possibly supports
the same "offline" mode.
> On Thursday, May 06, 2021 at 6:59 PM, notify--- via aur-requests
> mailto:aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org)>
As I said, it should be a merge request, so that requests to the old package
get redirected.
> On Thursday, Mar 25, 2021 at 7:54 PM, Giuseppe Nebbione
> mailto:nebbionegiuse...@gmail.com)> wrote:
>
> The package has been pushed under the name "kb" now, tested and works nicely.
> So we can delet
> On Thursday, Mar 25, 2021 at 7:47 PM, notify--- via aur-requests
> mailto:aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org)>
> wrote:
> gnebbia [1] filed a deletion request for python-kb [2]:
>
> I request the deletion of this package for two reasons:
> 1) the package is out-of-date
> 2) More importantly this
Sounds more like this package should be merged into that one, so anyone
currently still using it should be redirected to the replacement.
> On Wednesday, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:40 AM, notify--- via aur-requests
> mailto:aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org)>
> wrote:
> gyscos [1] filed a deletion reque
Same for this one, merge request.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:45 PM notify--- via aur-requests <
aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org> wrote:
> sainnhe [1] filed a deletion request for vim-forest-night-git [2]:
>
> The upstream has renamed this color scheme as everforest. I've created
> a new pkgbase f
This should technically be a merge request, then.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:45 PM notify--- via aur-requests <
aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org> wrote:
> sainnhe [1] filed a deletion request for neovim-forest-night-git [2]:
>
> The upstream has renamed this color scheme as everforest. I've create
It doesn't even look like a legitimate package, all it does is fetch a
script and run it.
On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 4:47 PM notify--- via aur-requests <
aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org> wrote:
> hwittenborn [1] filed a deletion request for checkra1n-cn [2]:
>
> Seems to try to look like the officia
11 matches
Mail list logo
