; [3].
Therefore, this isn't a valid reason for deletion.
Kind Regards,
AlphaLynx
[1]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines
[2]:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_package_guidelines#Package_sources
[3]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#source
On 6/12/25 5:42 PM, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
> AlphaLynx [1] filed an orphan request for wootility-appimage [2]:
>
> This package was marked out-of-date on February 26, 2025, and the
> maintainer appears to be unresponsive to update requests. I’d like to
> orphan it so s
why this is a duplicate in my comment on the purrcrypt package [5]. Am I
understanding the guidelines correctly, or am I misinterpreting
something about when the -git suffix packages are useful?
Could you reconsider based on this clarification?
Kind Regards,
AlphaLynx
[1]: https://aur.arch
te of
>> [purrcrypt](
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/purrcrypt
>> ).
>>
>> [1]
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/account/kochan/
>> [2]
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/purrcrypt-git/
Thanks kochan for filing the request.
Kind
is accepted.
Regards,
AlphaLynx
On Tuesday, June 10th, 2025 at 3:13 AM, Rubin wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I personally would not rename to update-systemd-resolved because this script
> is really specific to openvpn. Having openvpn in the name makes it easier for
> people to f
update-systemd-resolved as it would then be duplicate if this merge request is
declined).
Regards,
AlphaLynx
[1]
https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org/message/SJRNMQD4FF7LDE6WSWUXVP2OAKRRR3CK/
[2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#pkgname
[3] https
update-systemd-resolved as it would then be duplicate if this merge request is
declined).
Regards,
AlphaLynx
[1]
https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org/message/SJRNMQD4FF7LDE6WSWUXVP2OAKRRR3CK/
[2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#pkgname
[3] https
