NetSysFire [1] filed a deletion request for ix [2]:
As per latest comment, source is down because ix.io is down, too
("taking a break") since at least January 13th (per archwiki dead link
marking bot). It has been almost 5 months since ix.io went down. The
latest comment is from 2 months ago. Ther
Package zvm [1], flagged 2024-03-24
Maintainer abirvalarg [2], Last Login: 2023-12-18 (UTC)
[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/zvm/
[2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/abirvalarg
fwan [1] filed an orphan request for zvm [2]:
package is on version 0.5.3, upstream is currently on 0.7.1.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/fwan/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/zvm/
Request #60849 has been Rejected by artafinde [1]:
ignore
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/artafinde/
Request #60848 has been Rejected by artafinde [1]:
ignore
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/artafinde/
artafinde [1] filed a deletion request for caatinga [2]:
test - plz ignore
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/artafinde/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/caatinga/
Request #60821 has been Rejected by micwoj92 [1]:
Was updated.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/micwoj92/
Hello,
We are contacting you about your recent AUR requests.
While we understand your desire of unification for the Catppuccin
packages in the AUR under a single ownership to "officially" maintain
them (which is great), we would have preferred if those requests were
done more appropriately.
Hi Anankke
Hi Muflone,
Both of them are outdated. The new version is 1.6.3, and none of them are
updated.
If you want to maintain the hath package you can file an orphan request
and get the package in order to fix it.
Among the two existing packages, hentaiathome is outdated, orphan a
Request #60836 has been Accepted by bertptrs [1]:
[Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for vencord-x11-git.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/bertptrs/
Hi Muflone,
Both of them are outdated. The new version is 1.6.3, and none of them are
updated.
Best,
Anankke
On Saturday, June 8th, 2024 at PM 2:06, not...@aur.archlinux.org
wrote:
>
>
> Request #60795 has been Rejected by Muflone [1]:
>
> the hath package is older and still maintained
Yes, this is not only reason. But this package has been uploaded
almost 10 years ago and never touched. There has been multiple
upstream releases. Package itself has only gotten 1 vote and 0
comments in all these years. I think it is pretty clear that noone is
using it. It can always be re-uploaded
Request #60810 has been Rejected by bertptrs [1]:
Being an orphan is not a reason for deletion
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/bertptrs/
Request #60809 has been Rejected by bertptrs [1]:
Being an orphan is not a reason for deletion. Package is up-to-date
too.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/bertptrs/
Request #60835 has been Rejected by bertptrs [1]:
That is not a valid reason for deletion.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/bertptrs/
Request #60826 has been Rejected by rearwindowtaxidr [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/rearwindowtaxidr/
16 matches
Mail list logo
