Request #31523 has been accepted automatically by the Arch User
Repository package request system:
The package base has been flagged out-of-date since 2021-06-02.
morealaz [1] filed an orphan request for wasm-bindgen-cli [2]:
Maintainer did not responded to out of date request since 2021-06
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/morealaz/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wasm-bindgen-cli/
micwoj92 [1] filed an orphan request for python-flask-session [2]:
out of date for 1 month
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/micwoj92/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-flask-session/
micwoj92 [1] filed an orphan request for ruby-net-scp [2]:
out of date since 2020
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/micwoj92/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ruby-net-scp/
Request #31521 has been accepted automatically by the Arch User
Repository package request system:
The package base has been flagged out-of-date since 2020-10-30.
Thanks for pointing that out Jonathon, Ill fix it tomorrow, as I have done in
the past when requested changes.
I have concerns about the intent of the user requesting the deletion; for some
unknown reason the request came out of thin air to an actively maintained
package, created a duplicate -g
Request #31519 has been accepted by orhun [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/orhun/
On 15/01/2022 19:00, Sick Codes via aur-requests wrote:
anbox-modules-dkms follows last working commit with the patch for 5.10
anbox-modules-dkms-git follows master branch with sed instead of a patch
As of [1], anbox-modules-dkms is pinned to upstream commits. It is
therefore not a VCS packa
carlosal1015 [1] filed a deletion request for python-krylov [2]:
The project has been deleted few days ago, no source available.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/carlosal1015/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-krylov/
orhun [1] filed a deletion request for wasm-pack [2]:
This is now in [community]
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/orhun/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wasm-pack/
anbox-modules-dkms follows last working commit with the patch for 5.10
anbox-modules-dkms-git follows master branch with sed instead of a patch
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/VCS_package_guidelines#Guidelines
“Suffix pkgname with -cvs, -svn, -hg, -darcs, -bzr, -git etc. unless the
package fet
sandm [1] filed a request to merge woeusb-gui [2] into woeusbgui [3]:
I want to remove this hyphen from the package name for clarity
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/sandm/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/woeusb-gui/
[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/woeusbgui/
bbswitch-ati-dkms-git bbswitch-ati-git are split packages from the
same PKGBUILD. Of course they have same version.
darling is a duplicate of darling-git
yay follows upstream release, yay-git follows git branch
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 9:57 PM wrote:
>
> Are you suggesting that every AUR package
mikelpint [1] filed a deletion request for pokemmo-deb [2]:
I will delete this package as I didn't even remember that I used to
maintain it and there's a much better version in the AUR. Sorry for
the inconveniences.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/mikelpint/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pk
Are you suggesting that every AUR package that is up to date with master where
there is a -git package should be removed?
bbswitch-ati-dkms-git 0.8.5.gddbd243-1 3
bbswitch-ati-git0.8.5.gddbd243-1
darling r3131.fa5348c8a-1
darling-git r3131.fa5348c8a-1
yay 11.1.0-1
yay-git 11.1.0.r0
xeruf [1] filed an orphan request for context-git [2]:
not updated months after OOD flag, broken dependency
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/xeruf/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/context-git/
It is still a duplicate. There are no releases upstream. What's the point
of having a non git version if it's just going to follow the latest git
commit anyway?
Yes this matter was resolved. The package was merged. That is why
anbox-modules-dkms should not exist.
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 4:08 PM
xeruf [1] filed a request to merge context-bin [2] into context [3]:
There is no source distribution, so the bin-suffix is superfluous
according to packaging guidelines. I own both packages.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/xeruf/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/context-bin/
[3] https:
Request #31475 has been accepted by felixonmars [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/felixonmars/
Request #31466 has been accepted by felixonmars [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/felixonmars/
Request #31514 has been accepted by felixonmars [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/felixonmars/
felixonmars [1] filed a deletion request for wgcf [2]:
Moved to [community]. Thanks for maintaining it!
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/felixonmars/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wgcf/
FabioLolix [1] filed a deletion request for neovim-stable-bin [2]:
Duplicate of neowim because the user is on Manjaro, uploader comment:
"I know that there exists a bunch of other neovim packages, but none
of these fit my case. As I am on Manjaro, which apparently is super
slow at releasing 6.1 an
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 11:10 AM wrote:
>
> This is a false deletion request, the maintainer knows this is a correct
> non-git dkms PKGBUILD
I don't think so.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=anbox-modules-dkms
>
> The maintainer discussion between myself and the other
24 matches
Mail list logo
