Request #20135 has been rejected by eschwartz [1]:
maintainer updated, requester added as comaintainer
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/eschwartz/
Request #20089 has been rejected by eschwartz [1]:
maintainer updated
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/eschwartz/
Request #20067 has been accepted by eschwartz [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/eschwartz/
jsh6789 [1] filed a deletion request for test-package [2]:
Quite empty, been on the AUR a while now.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/jsh6789/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/test-package/
Request #20422 has been rejected by eschwartz [1]:
It is not possible to purge personal data by deleting and re-uploading
a package, since the git repo is persistent.
I've communicated privately with the user and based on that
discussion, I've used git-filter-branch to purge the git authorship
in
Request #20421 has been accepted by eschwartz [1]:
The current maintainer adopted the package, then never modified it in
any way. It's been flagged out of date for 3+ months without any
attempt to respond or demonstrate the act of maintaining the package.
I deem that ljmf00 does not have a valid
Request #20429 has been accepted by eschwartz [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/eschwartz/
katt [1] filed a deletion request for sl-sh-git [2]:
- missing pkgver() function
- provides and conflicts with itself
- build actually fails with "no override and no default toolchain set"
so I won't bother looking for more. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/katt/
[2] https://aur.ar
Request #20374 has been rejected by diabonas [1]:
Invalid request, also see https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-
requests/2020-July/042519.html
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/diabonas/
katt [1] filed a deletion request for python-mapnik-git [2]:
-git package sticking to releases
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/katt/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-mapnik-git/
Hey,
Please tell me: Why would you file a _deletion_ request (a request
with intention to fully remove the package from AUR) against an
actively maintained package with active users relying on that package
to be present, asking to "get the package"?
I don't get the intention behind this. If somet
cippaciong [1] filed a deletion request for gajim-plugin-omemo-gtk3
[2]:
This package is not needed anymore. It was meant for when we had gajim
< 1.0 in the repos which was almost two years ago.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/cippaciong/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/gajim-plugin-o
Request #20428 has been accepted automatically by the Arch User
Repository package request system:
The user Aetf disowned the package.
SolarAquarion [1] filed an orphan request for kdevelop-git [2]:
the maintainer has been inactive for a long time
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/SolarAquarion/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/kdevelop-git/
Svenstaro [1] filed an orphan request for grex [2]:
User seems inactive and package is out of date for 3 months.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Svenstaro/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/grex/
erkexzcx [1] filed a deletion request for jellyfin-bin [2]:
Jellyfin software used to be installed using a single package, that
contains all "server" and "web" files, but recently it has been split
into 2 separate packages - "server" package and "web" package.
"server" package provides core functi
Request #20392 has been accepted by City-busz [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/City-busz/
schard [1] filed a deletion request for archisomod-git [2]:
Being also the maintainer of the upstream code, I dropped archisomod
in favor of the official archiso package, since archisomod no longer
has a significant advantage over the original tool.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/schard/
[
18 matches
Mail list logo
