On Sat, 2024-09-21 at 19:28 +, matt quintanilla wrote:
> A request for the pkgbuild to be updated[1] [2]quickly degenerated in insults
> [1
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thorium-browser-bin?O=0#comment-991699[2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thorium-browser-bin#comment-991710
> My wo
That is not a request for update! However, the reply is hostile, even though
not insulting.
--
Best Regards,
Abraham
Sent with Tutanota; https://tuta.com
Sep 21, 2024, 19:29 by mattquintanill...@gmail.com:
> A request for the pkgbuild to be updated[1] [2]quickly degenerated ininsults
> [1>
On 24/07/08 11:25PM, james smith wrote:
> A request for the pkgbuild to be updated[1] [2] quickly degenerated in
> insults
> [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sunshine?O=10#comment-981082
> [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sunshine?O=10#comment-981374
Hey james,
thanks for bringing this
Am 10. Juli 2024 02:29:32 MESZ schrieb "David C. Rankin"
:
>On 7/8/24 6:46 PM, Abraham S.A.H. wrote:
>> Comments are of course hostile. But, what are the insulting parts of
>> them?
>>
>> I wonder what is the right sort of action to do in situations such as what
>> is happening in those AUR comme
On 7/8/24 6:46 PM, Abraham S.A.H. wrote:
Comments are of course hostile. But, what are the insulting parts of
them?
I wonder what is the right sort of action to do in situations such as what
is happening in those AUR comments.
Any time I read
pulled of a "Jia Tan" takeover of the package
Comments are of course hostile. But, what are the insulting parts of them?
I wonder what is the right sort of action to do in situations such as what is
happening in those AUR comments.
--
Best Regards,
Abraham
Sent with Tutanota; https://tuta.com
