Thanks artafinde for the clarification, and thanks also Polarian, your
explanations were
worth reading!
> As an additional sidenode, if the issue you want to report is that the
> package is
> broken because it can't be built, the maintainer has already highlighted that
> it is due
> to gcc updat
On 09/05/2023 21:56, paul.mirkwood wrote:
Hello everyone,
Hello,
I'm pretty new here so I hope you will forgive me if my question isn't
appropriate.
Welcome,
Currently, the mangohud package is broken even though upstream has fixed
the bug.
The mangohud-git package is also fine.
That's pr
h upstream has fixed the
bug.
The mangohud-git package is also fine.
Best regards, and thanks for your answers,
Mirkwood
--- Forwarded Message ---
De : paul.mirkwood
Date : mardi 9 mai 2023 à 10:51 PM
Objet : Broken package
À : aur-general@lists.archlinux.org
> Hello everyone,
>