Re: Broken Package

2023-05-09 Thread paul.mirkwood
Thanks artafinde for the clarification, and thanks also Polarian, your explanations were worth reading! > As an additional sidenode, if the issue you want to report is that the > package is > broken because it can't be built, the maintainer has already highlighted that > it is due > to gcc updat

Re: Broken package

2023-05-09 Thread Leonidas Spyropoulos
On 09/05/2023 21:56, paul.mirkwood wrote: Hello everyone, Hello, I'm pretty new here so I hope you will forgive me if my question isn't appropriate. Welcome, Currently, the mangohud package is broken even though upstream has fixed the bug. The mangohud-git package is also fine. That's pr

Broken package

2023-05-09 Thread paul.mirkwood
h upstream has fixed the bug. The mangohud-git package is also fine. Best regards, and thanks for your answers, Mirkwood --- Forwarded Message --- De : paul.mirkwood Date : mardi 9 mai 2023 à 10:51 PM Objet : Broken package À : aur-general@lists.archlinux.org > Hello everyone, >