Also, I tend to give priority to orphan requests, as someone else is
awaiting to fix packages issues, so giving priority to these requests
the packages will be fixed quicker.
I noticed this a lot, but it means merge requests take months to be
accepted, and deletion requests can sit there for pote
Hi there
I won't enter into all the discussion details but an explicit accusation
needs be cleared:
However there is a lot to be said with the response time of legitimate
requests, it does seem like MarsSeed has priority, I have seen their
requests be handle very quickly, while others wait f
On 15/11/2023 17:59, 7Ji wrote:
Hello Leonidas,
Hello,
I've changed the subject since this is not related to the thread about
requests.
Sorry if this is off-topic, but since Arch Gitlab is restricting
registration I don't have an account to ask there
You can ask for an account - please s
> They raise concerns about the amount of requests you fill. If I look at the
> requests page now I see 4 within 30 seconds which can give the impression
> that it is automated, note that they said in their email "script-like" which
> does not imply it is scripted.
That doesn't sound right. Fir
Hello Leonidas,
Sorry if this is off-topic, but since Arch Gitlab is restricting
registration I don't have an account to ask there
As I want to poke around the aurweb codes and possibly send patches later,
I've just fetched the source and dug a little bit.
Turns out, based on how aurweb/initdb.p
hi,
i have been CCed enough times,
so i might give my opinion a bit.
2 years ago,
when i was spamming deletion requests kinda like MarsSeed,
i was asked to stop making deletion requests for packages with broken
dependencies because, i was told that, some script would be developed to
help to clea
Hi Marcell,
I'm not interested in continuing the flame / blame war so I will not
response to the previous wall of text.
I am curious to understand if you see a problem with you opening
thousands of requests in AUR. We clearly stated in many occasions this
is not sustainable from our side (Pa
Hi @felixonmars, thank you for your feedback.
Other AUR Package Maintainers / Developers like @muflone have asserted that
packages on AUR should work with x86_64. Also there's a statement to that
effect in Arch package guidelines, linked to by AUR submission guidelines, and
the latter states th
> I've never said your previous work was bad /
> harmful, nor did I disagree with previous PM's
> decisions. More than so I did not judge any
> PM. But you're associating your work with
> PM's and I don't think that's right. It was the
> requests that are your work, not PMs
> decisions, and their
>
> Same as GIT packages. archived or not archived, you can still download and
> you can still build (in some cases). -git vcs packages (or other vcs
> protocols) is only the method for fetch the contents. is not necessary keep
> still in developement
this can be applied to old (older than 2023)
Hi,
On 15/11/2023 15:21, Marcell Meszaros wrote:
Hi all,
Again quoting from the mail I am currently responding to:
Getting this automated in AURWeb itself would be a lot more helpful then
filling ~ 50k deletion requests.
I don't know where the 50k (50.000) figure comes from. I have filed
On 11/15/23 16:21, Marcell Meszaros wrote:
'armcl' stands for ARM ComputeLibrary. For using ARM-based SoC's and their GPU
component for mass parallellized, floating point heavy computation.
Which clearly won't work with the x86 architecture.
How is this just irrelevant and baseless spam?
The
Am 15.11.23 um 15:21 schrieb Marcell Meszaros:
Which clearly won't work with the x86 architecture.
You have clearly not understood how cross compiling works.
--
regards,
brainpower
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
> Please don't frame me with baseless accusations
> In followup to that, @7Ji has mass-filed 40+ deletion requests of their
own, for other ARM-only packages, and for some other package that are not
necessarily ARM only (and @muflone has rejected a few of them because of
this). So who is the one wh
Hi all,
Please don't frame me with baseless accusations like the statement that I am
using scripts to file mass requests. I emphatically do not do that.
I have filed every single request by hand, and with relevant evaluation behind
all of them.
>> The direct reason I want to post this is readi
Hi,
I am not going to respond to everything in this email it's way tooo
long. But CC'ing zoorat/MarsSeed as they are discussed here.
On 15/11/2023 11:28, 7Ji wrote:
My opinion on this first: I'm not against his intention to clean AUR.
I'm against using some self-written scripts to mass-file r
My opinion on this first: I'm not against his intention to clean AUR. I'm
against using some self-written scripts to mass-file requests to certain
packages just based on t
heir traits, like keywords, names, or whatever. I'm also against doing so
by hand, which is basically using yourself as a reque
17 matches
Mail list logo
