I do not think this is a bug, when viewing the web page for the package base [1]
it does not display the description, but when viewing the individual package's
page [2], it does display them.
yes for systemd-git its correct because it is the first package in that split
package.
but its not corr
On Mon, 2022-08-29 at 14:34 +0200, Thomas via aur-general wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have 2 questions:
>
> 1) when is it allowed and / or good practice to split multiple packages by 1
> PKGBUILD?
> For example I have created a package which pulls 3 debian packages and
> creates 3 Arch packages from it.
Leonidas,
many thanks for the quick response!
well the reason for 1) is simple... lazyness ;) its just more convenient for me
that way.
I am just not sure if that is against any recommendations or just a bad way
doing it in the given example?
Afaiu I should better create 3 packages instead of
Hi Thomas,
On 29/08/2022 15:34, Thomas via aur-general wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have 2 questions:
>
> 1) when is it allowed and / or good practice to split multiple
> packages by 1 PKGBUILD?
> For example I have created a package which pulls 3 debian packages and
> creates 3 Arch packages from it.
> I w
Hi,
I have 2 questions:
1) when is it allowed and / or good practice to split multiple packages by 1
PKGBUILD?
For example I have created a package which pulls 3 debian packages and creates
3 Arch packages from it.
I want to do that in 1 PKGBUILD by package splitting. Is that a good idea or
s
