Re: [aur-general] audacity3

2021-06-22 Thread alad via aur-general
On 22/06/2021 12:56, Sam Mulvey via aur-general wrote: On 6/22/21 3:16 AM, alad via aur-general wrote: There's 59 TUs looking after 70676 packages and moderating 85141 users. To make that manageable, you need some a strict set of rules. One of them is not submitting "-latest" packages that a

Re: [aur-general] audacity3

2021-06-22 Thread Sam Mulvey via aur-general
On 6/22/21 3:16 AM, alad via aur-general wrote: There's 59 TUs looking after 70676 packages and moderating 85141 users. To make that manageable, you need some a strict set of rules. One of them is not submitting "-latest" packages that are already in the repos. But the implementation is not

Re: [aur-general] audacity3

2021-06-22 Thread alad via aur-general
On 22/06/2021 12:05, Sam Mulvey via aur-general wrote: On 6/22/21 1:48 AM, Caleb Maclennan via aur-general wrote: As background, many years ago when working as an audio engineer I used to use it in production nearly full time. I'm quite familiar with it's past and the weird development practic

Re: [aur-general] audacity3

2021-06-22 Thread Sam Mulvey via aur-general
On 6/22/21 1:48 AM, Caleb Maclennan via aur-general wrote: As background, many years ago when working as an audio engineer I used to use it in production nearly full time. I'm quite familiar with it's past and the weird development practices upstream (such as forked toolkit versions). I am no l