On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 11:05:11AM +0200, alad via aur-general wrote:
> On 02/07/2021 01:35, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> > On 7/1/21 8:34 AM, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote:
> > > runc, which the entire container ecosystem has been depending on the past
> > > 7 years,
> > > got it
On 02/07/2021 01:35, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
On 7/1/21 8:34 AM, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote:
runc, which the entire container ecosystem has been depending on the past 7
years,
got it's first stable release last week after almost 100 release candidates :)
The very first v
On 7/1/21 8:34 AM, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote:
> runc, which the entire container ecosystem has been depending on the past 7
> years,
> got it's first stable release last week after almost 100 release candidates :)
The very first version of runc in the official repos was 0.1.0, not
0.
On 01/07/2021 14:34, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 09:52:54PM -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
On 6/30/21 9:35 PM, George Rawlinson via aur-general wrote:
On 21-06-30 15:05, alad via aur-general wrote:
The question if the package will ever make it to
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 09:52:54PM -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> On 6/30/21 9:35 PM, George Rawlinson via aur-general wrote:
> > On 21-06-30 15:05, alad via aur-general wrote:
> >> The question if the package will ever make it to community - most people
> >> won't have community-test
On 6/30/21 9:35 PM, George Rawlinson via aur-general wrote:
> On 21-06-30 15:05, alad via aur-general wrote:
>> The question if the package will ever make it to community - most people
>> won't have community-testing enabled. It's not very typical for new packages
>> that weren't in the repositorie
On 21-06-30 15:05, alad via aur-general wrote:
> The question if the package will ever make it to community - most people
> won't have community-testing enabled. It's not very typical for new packages
> that weren't in the repositories before. My guess it was because an alpha
> version was packaged
On 30/06/2021 13:54, Rafael Fontenelle via aur-general wrote:
Hi Markus
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 6:45 AM Markus Arians via aur-general
wrote:
Hi everyone,
today I noticed I was unable to push to the AUR repository for the pijul
package with the server hook error message "remote: error: package
Hi Rafael,
I understand. Will do, thanks!
Markus
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 1:54 PM Rafael Fontenelle
wrote:
> Hi Markus
>
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 6:45 AM Markus Arians via aur-general
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > today I noticed I was unable to push to the AUR repository for the piju
Hi Markus
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 6:45 AM Markus Arians via aur-general
wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> today I noticed I was unable to push to the AUR repository for the pijul
> package with the server hook error message "remote: error: package already
> provided by [community-testing]: pijul".
>
>
Hi everyone,
today I noticed I was unable to push to the AUR repository for the pijul
package with the server hook error message "remote: error: package already
provided by [community-testing]: pijul".
Sure enough, the package exists in the Community-Testing repository (see
https://archlinux.org/
11 matches
Mail list logo
