Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#37061] Deletion Request for taskfile-gotask-git

2022-08-22 Thread Martin Rys via aur-general
I was not aware of the other two go-task packages. I have created AUR/go-task-git and filed a merge request for AUR/taskfile-git to unify things. I have also changed the binary name to match the other two existing packages (go-task). I am still not 100% convinced that 'go-task' is a good name fo

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#37061] Deletion Request for taskfile-gotask-git

2022-08-22 Thread Stanislav N. aka pztrn via aur-general
It tab-completes very great. And even earlier than in your version. Only if you remember it starts with a 'g', instead of the original 't'. If you're following official documentation and trying to use 'task' and wondering why it's red and not found, tab-complete will save you there. It will

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#37061] Deletion Request for taskfile-gotask-git

2022-08-22 Thread Martin Rys via aur-general
(resending as I was not subscribed to aur-general before) > It tab-completes very great. And even earlier than in your version. Only if you remember it starts with a 'g', instead of the original 't'. If you're following official documentation and trying to use 'task' and wondering why it's red an

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#37061] Deletion Request for taskfile-gotask-git

2022-08-21 Thread Stanislav N. aka pztrn via aur-general
Hello, forwarding a discussion about package deletion to AUR general list, as our thread didn't reach aur-requests. 22.08.2022 00:23, Stanislav N. aka pztrn пишет: 21.08.2022 23:56, Martin Rys пишет: I believe the request is still valid no matter which naming convention the executable will use