sorry
i wanted to send this to arch general not aur general
my bad
On 11/18/23 17:51, zoorat wrote:
> hi,
>
--
yours zoorat,
PGP: 0586360F8791A5492251129802DDA8074345
GITHUB: https://github.com/z00rat
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ns),
or hardcore pure Bangla translation ??
in my opinion, it's better to keep it how people normally talk.
have a nice day.
--
yours zoorat,
PGP: 0586360F8791A5492251129802DDA8074345
GITHUB: https://github.com/z00rat
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ns, despite the hostile and demeaning accusations and
>> classification that I have seen levied against me.
>>
>> I think also that fair treatment is a necessity when one is accused and
>> framed, and such attacks should be called out rather than being tolerated or
>> outright condoned. If AUR staff gives in to such, that would just alienate
>> good-faith members like me.
>
> I don't read the email of 7Ji as an attack or framing. They raise
> concerns about the amount of requests you fill. If I look at the
> requests page now I see 4 within 30 seconds which can give the
> impression that it is automated, note that they said in their email
> "script-like" which does not imply it is scripted.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Jelle
--
yours zoorat,
PGP: 0586360F8791A5492251129802DDA8074345
GITHUB: https://github.com/z00rat
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
m-plugins-*.tar.gz"`
- are orphan
- 0 votes, 0 popularity
- no download instruction
tried to build some of them, but they had some .so files.
i'm not sure if it's allowed to have packages like this.
if you have time, look into it.
have a nice day.
--
yours zoorat,
PGP: 05
't mean any harm. i wrote some script myself to help me do this.
i do pick up packages that look like people use.
> David, I believe they meant should orphaned old packages be deleted for
> not being up to date and not actively maintained, if so see above.
>
> If I am wrong, fe
t;work" why not
> try to adopt them, instead of deleting them.
--
yours zoorat,
PGP: 0586360F8791A5492251129802DDA8074345
GITHUB: https://github.com/z00rat
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
?
>
> I want to add that sometimes the maintainer might be already
> working on an update but didn't release it.
> It's easier to branch of a package and test it until merging it to the
> AUR sometimes.
--
yours zoorat,
PGP: 0586360F8791A5492251129802DDA8074345
GITHUB: https://github.com/z00rat
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
maintainer and
if he does not update, should i file req then ??
what if there is no way to contact him ??
2. should AUR host out-of-date but working packages ??
3. is it ok to ask people to be co-maintainer for their pkgs ??
4. review my PKGBUILDs, please
list: https://aur.archlinux.org/packag
hey man,
thanks a lot for the help.
i gave you access to 3 packages you asked for.
and 'aminvakil' will be co-maintaining along side you the 'python-spotdl'
package.
yours,
zoorat.
βββ Original Message βββ
On Monday, January 10th, 2022 at 19:15, Alexis BRENON
st'.
btw way you wanna be a maintainer of 'python-torrequest' ??
that thing have 5 commit and last updated 2018...
i adopted it so that no one would try to delete it...
yours,
zoorat.
βββ Original Message βββ
On Monday, January 10th, 2022 at 03:37, Kevin Morris wrote:
> Hi
hen i will make you co-maintainer of 'faq-bin'.
yours,
zoorat.
On Sunday, January 9th, 2022 at 10:22, Yash Karandikar
wrote:
> Hi zoorat,
>
> I'm interested in comaintaining the faq-bin[1] package.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yash
>
> [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org
make you the co-maintainer,
thanks a lot for helping me.
btw, i dont know much about co-maintaining...
tell me what i should do and shouldn't...
yours,
zoorat.
p.s. im in rush, dont mind my bad english.
ets the user know
how to get the file to make this package ??
don't know if this kinda package is allowed...
5. how to get the exact number of requests I had to make and how many of them
got accepted...
do you know any easy to get that info??
or do I have to somehow parse and count mbox fi
"gtk3","webrtc-audio-processing","check","git","meson","xmltomp,"git","i-xbrtrdmmm/lets-cli/lets"kdh7rtrdmmm/lGPL"],"Kprof2-git"],"Prcheck","gitxen<=9],"Decheck","gitends"&
> Kevin Morris
> Software Developer
That's awesome kevin,
I got into a problem while downloading the
'packages-meta-ext-v1.json.gz' with wget.
I somehow corrupted it ...
so, is there any hash I can check against ??
like '.sig' file for '.iso' filesΒ but, as a hash is a text file maybe ??...
sorry if I'm being dumb.
yours,
zoorat.
>> I am not a python programmer, so I might be wrong...
>> but what I found after testing my program needs files of `
>>
>> /
>>
>> usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/yt_dlp
>>
>> /
>>
>> ` folder.
>>
>> but,
>> community/yt-dlp package dose not have files of `
>>
>> /
>>
>> usr/lib/python3.9/site-pac
ction as a
dependency should I upload it ??
or should I make a bug report in community/yt-dl ??.
yours,
zoorat.
le as gtkedit.
it's gtkwrite we are talking about.
> With GtkSourceView it compiles as gtkwrite (requires GtkSourceView 2.x).
and you need "gtksourceview2" and only v2 to build gtkwrite.
we need that app's code to be updated or "gtksourceview2" package alive again.
after getting no hope of fixing the PKGBUILD, I submit that deletion request.
I hope it's not a mistake.
ps, what else I should do to avoid wrong requests ??
your's
zoorat.
Hi David,
I'm zoorat.
I'm the guy who sent deletion requests to "gtkwrite" and "gtkwrite-git". no
clue about "gtkate" tho.
The reason for deletion are
1. Missing dependency (gtksourceview2)
with that broken dependency, you can't build any of those pack
19 matches
Mail list logo