Hello,
> Is there a rational for naming packages "golang-golang-"* ?
I don't know whether it's a good reason, but there's definitely a reason.
There are basically two kinds of Go packages with a golang-* prefix in
the official (non-AUR) Arch repos:
- golang-golang-x-* packages, whose Upstream URL
Hello,
> "C" is just a letter of the alphabet ;), much likely nobody using Arch
> Linux does confuse the letter of the alphabet with the programming
> language, hence we don't call it "clang". I'm not convinced that "Go"
> is a verb. Maybe it's an "abbreviation". It's probably both in one.
>
> Ou
Thanks artafinde for the clarification, and thanks also Polarian, your
explanations were
worth reading!
> As an additional sidenode, if the issue you want to report is that the
> package is
> broken because it can't be built, the maintainer has already highlighted that
> it is due
> to gcc updat
h upstream has fixed the
bug.
The mangohud-git package is also fine.
Best regards, and thanks for your answers,
Mirkwood
--- Forwarded Message ---
De : paul.mirkwood
Date : mardi 9 mai 2023 à 10:51 PM
Objet : Broken package
À : aur-general@lists.archlinux.org
> Hello everyone,
>
