ments please feel free.
All the best
Thomas
November 14, 2022 4:20 PM, "Jonathon Fernyhough" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm out of commission for a while (not sure how long) so I won't be able to
> update my packages.
>
> If any TU wants to bump the obvio
Hi all,
I'm out of commission for a while (not sure how long) so I won't be able
to update my packages.
If any TU wants to bump the obvious ones (e.g. firefox-esr) please feel
free.
Best,
Jonathon
On 14/10/2022 15:03, Frederic Bezies wrote:
My question is: are these custom PKGBUILD are or not allowed on AUR?
Why wouldn't they be? Because the name includes "cachyos", or for some
other reason?
On 08/09/2022 20:59, Guilhem Saurel via aur-general wrote:
Or even better
cmake -B build -S . -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr
cmake --build build
Any opinions ? Should we put that on the wiki² ?
Sorry, I jumped too fast. -.-
It does look like this is the default recommendation according to the
On 08/09/2022 20:59, Guilhem Saurel via aur-general wrote:
But I think we should let the end user choose if they want make or ninja, by
letting them configure their CMAKE_GENERATOR environment variable
Why? Isn't it the job of the PKGBUILD maintainer to maintain the
PKGBUILD so the software bu
On 25/07/2022 18:57, Campbell Jones via aur-general wrote:
I currently have two machines - one desktop, which I use for most of my work,
and one significantly less powerful laptop that I'm typing this email from.
Both of these machines are currently running EndeavourOS, and not vanilla Arch
Li
Just to highlight the obvious,
On 25/07/2022 14:57, Campbell Jones via aur-general wrote:
I elected to install EndeavourOS as a way of getting a somewhat curated experience on Arch.
-snip-> Though I haven't been on Arch for long
Are you running EndeavourOS, or Arch? ;P
OpenPGP_signature
Desc
Oracle, Amazon, and Google provide VMs within their free tiers.
There are a number of shell-only providers out there too (e.g. SDF) that
you could conceivably use for SSH forwarding.
On 18/04/2022 14:43, Ryan via aur-general wrote:
Many VPS providers have cheap "starter" plans at $3-4 per mon
I've pushed GCC 10 to the AUR:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gcc10
It's based on the older GCC 9 PKGBUILD [1] with some elements from the
GCC 11 PKGBUILD [2].
It builds, installs, and seemingly runs OK, but it's something with
potential for hidden gotchas so if someone could cast their
On 05/01/2022 06:08, slbtty via aur-general wrote:
The texlive in official repo
is out-dated and unable to pull other packages from CPAN. The system
texlive and the dependencies on it is broken.
Has anyone filed a bug?
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 02/01/2022 22:54, Xyne via aur-general wrote:
I actually would be in favor of using the -bin suffix even for packages without
a non-bin variant.
I was under the impression that `-bin` was to be used for any
pre-compiled version (e.g. whether sourced from upstream or from deb or
RPM etc.)?
On 09/11/2021 00:23, George Rawlinson via aur-general wrote:
I am interested in seeing what others think (not just staff members) of
the situation.
TUs are supposed to be trusted, and "deleted" AUR packages can be
trivially reinstated when required. There's an audit log available, and
if some
On 17/10/2021 15:42, todd freed wrote:> Though, if I build a couple
variants from a single PKGBUILD (which I
think is what split-package means), wouldn't users need to have
dependencies installed sufficient to build all of them?
Whatever is listed in the top-level depends and makedepends will b
On 17/10/2021 05:52, todd freed via aur-general wrote:
Is this a use-case for split-package?
Very likely. I'd probably package them as $pkgname-wayland and
$pkgname-xorg and have them both provide $pkgname.
(Though, if one backend was the upstream default then I might package
that as $pkgna
On 06/10/2021 21:45, Strahinya Radich via aur-general wrote:
I tried contacting fossdd today early in the morning about this, but got no
response yet. I would appreciate an advice on this.
You might want to give them a little more time. Generally speaking, if
the package is currently broken, t
On 10/09/2021 23:19, Jason Kercher via aur-general wrote:
I was wondering if there is a place (or if this is that place) to find
packages in need of a maintainer?
Have a look at the orphaned package list,
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?O=0&SeB=nd&K=&outdated=&SB=n&SO=a&PP=50&do_Orphans=Or
On 18/06/2021 16:21, alad via aur-general wrote:
> On 18/06/2021 16:43, Jonathon Fernyhough via aur-general wrote:
>> ...
>> Or, is an executable /tmp a reasonable assumption? 🤔
>
> I don't see anything in file-hierarchy(7) that mandates an executable
> /tmp. That
On 18/06/2021 14:05, Jan Kohnert via aur-general wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a new version of a (binary) package I'm maintaining (clockify-desktop)
> requires an
> executable /tmp directory to run.
>
My immediate questions would be why, and is this an upstream issue?
Or, is an executable /tmp a reasonab
On 12/05/2021 18:30, Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote:
> Em maio 12, 2021 14:11 alad via aur-general escreveu:
>>
>> Going over the linked packages, they all fall in the latter category.
>>
>
> Terminate them with extreme prejudice!
Hold up. Some of the Garuda packages I can probably agr
On 28/03/2021 21:28, Michal Janočko via aur-general wrote:
> Is there anything I can do? (I can't re-register with the same email)
Maybe try the "Forgot password" link?
https://aur.archlinux.org/passreset/
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 28/02/2021 04:45, Ralf Mardorf via aur-general wrote:
> It might be unnecessary to build "the single `hugo` binary", but it's
> sort of necessary to build a package, at least if you prefer a
> well-structured over a poorly structured Arch Linux install.
My point, supporting the discussion so fa
On 27/02/2021 12:42, Kr1ss via aur-general wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 01:24:13PM +0100, AUR General Requests wrote:
>> Thanks for your reply! I would have another question, if the package is
>> still not updated, will it be removed from the community repo?
>>
> - End of Quote -
>
> The pack
22 matches
Mail list logo
