On 3/1/23 13:55, Robin Candau wrote:
Thanks for adopting a more comprehensive and helping point of view.
Once again, it was more about the form than the initial goal. Help is always
appreciated :)
Honestly, I was angry of being kicked twice in a row (deletion + suspension).
But it does not m
On 3/1/23 12:42, Robin Candau wrote:
Identifying not complying packages is surely helpful /if done properly/, but certainly
not in that form. Once again, while we appreciate your will to help, no one asked or
expected you going in such a hunt and reporting that much packages at once with the s
On 3/1/23 17:24, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
You filled ~ 50 requests in X minutes with just "Not allowed by AUR submission
guidelines". Without further detail about what is wrong with the package causing the
TU's to have to figure out what this request is about.
About 20 of that packages were
On 3/1/23 10:30, Oskar Roesler wrote:
The TU's aren't judges in criminal court. It's totally ok and beneficial if
they apply some pragmatism and common sense. Hell, even real court judges are
allowed to vary in their decisionmaking. No, you're not discriminated because
they stopped your react
On 2/28/23 22:07, Morten Linderud wrote:
Nobody asked you to hunt the AUR for packages you think are breaking the rules.
Several of the packages you are reporting have several votes and usages beyond
calling them "-light" because you removed a dependency didn't like.
Now we are stuck with a bun
Hello.
My AUR account (Hanabishi) was suspended. There is a mistake happened.
You maybe thought that I am abusing requests, but my actions are actually
agreed with TU.
I am just helping to find duplicate packages (already present in official
repos), which are violating AUR submission guidelines.
