Re: Could someone please fix DL link oki-c321-c331-c531

2025-04-04 Thread digear466
Have you tried contacting the maintainer by email (which is available on the first line in the PKGBUILD)? If the maintainer does not respond, you may refer to Jakobsen's suggestion [1]: If the maintainer is not active and does not respond within a week or two then you could mark the package

Re: Are those android-$arch-$package packages allowed in AUR?

2025-01-17 Thread digear466
Should we update the ArchWiki page [1] then? e.g. Old: The AUR and official repositories are intended for packages which install general software and software-related content, including one or more of the following: executable(s); configuration file(s); online or offline documentation for spe

Re: Are those android-$arch-$package packages allowed in AUR?

2025-01-15 Thread digear466
Hi Muflone, For examples, please refer to the packages listed in "Required by" section: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/android-configure?all_reqs=1#pkgreqs e.g. android-aarch64-a52dec (make) android-aarch64-alsa-lib (make) android-aarch64-cdparanoia (make) android-aarch64-cppunit (make)

Are those android-$arch-$package packages allowed in AUR?

2025-01-14 Thread digear466
Hello, With reference to [1], are those android-$arch-$package packages allowed in AUR? [2] Packages in the AUR should be useful on Arch Linux, which is currently an x86_64-only distribution. It seems that those packages are for Android (not useful on Arch), which may not meet the above re