Re: [aur-general] Fwd: [PRQ#33929] Deletion Request for vdr-api

2022-04-10 Thread alad via aur-general
On Sun, 10 Apr 2022 13:31:16 +0200 Manuel Reimer via aur-general wrote: > Forwarding as I think my reply to "aur-requests" will not be actually > delivered: > > > Actually I leave this to the "Arch staff" to decide. > > Yes, you are right that this was created to "work around" issues in some >

Re: [aur-general] Clarification for Deletion request #30701

2021-12-28 Thread alad via aur-general
On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 15:06:44 -0800 Brett Cornwall wrote: > On 2021-12-27 23:26, alad via aur-general wrote: > >On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 07:01:08 -0800 > >Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote: > > > >> On 2021-12-17 09:54, Filipe Laíns via aur-general wrote: > >

Re: [aur-general] Clarification for Deletion request #30701

2021-12-27 Thread alad via aur-general
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 07:01:08 -0800 Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote: > On 2021-12-17 09:54, Filipe Laíns via aur-general wrote: > >On Fri, 2021-12-17 at 00:17 +0100, Justin Kromlinger via aur-general wrote: > >> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 01:05:19 +0200 > >> silentnoodle via aur-general wrote: > >>

Re: [aur-general] Handling own requests (Was: [PRQ#29045] Deletion Request for hugo-bin)

2021-11-08 Thread alad via aur-general
On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 17:47:16 -0800 Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote: > On 2021-11-07 18:26, George Rawlinson via aur-general wrote: > >What is the issue with handling one's own requests, specifcally? > > I guess I don't see anything on the Wiki. I was under the impression > that we didn't se

[aur-general] Stepping down as TU

2021-08-08 Thread alad via aur-general
Hi all, For some time now my involvement as TU has been limited, particularly on the packaging front. I'd always thought I'd get more time, but I keep getting more on my plate from my graduate studies. With the steady influx of fresh blood to the TU team, it now seems a good time for me to resig

Re: [aur-general] Pushing rc version of package to aur

2021-08-01 Thread alad via aur-general
On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 14:10:19 +0200 Jan Kohnert via aur-general wrote: > Hi, > Am Freitag, 30. Juli 2021, 23:12:01 CEST schrieb Vince via aur-general: > > disallowed to put release candidates into a stable package. Exceptions can > > be read on the wiki [1]. > > [] > > > [1] > > https://wik

Re: [aur-general] TU application - Morganamilo

2021-07-03 Thread alad via aur-general
On 03/07/2021 10:16, Morgan Adamiec via aur-general wrote: On 03/07/2021 08:59, alad via aur-general wrote: On 03/07/2021 09:35, Morgan Adamiec via aur-general wrote: On 03/07/2021 04:03, Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote: Hello, Morgan! Nice to meet you. :) Hi there, nice to see some

Re: [aur-general] TU application - Morganamilo

2021-07-03 Thread alad via aur-general
On 03/07/2021 09:35, Morgan Adamiec via aur-general wrote: On 03/07/2021 04:03, Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote: Hello, Morgan! Nice to meet you. :) Hi there, nice to see some one break the silence. I think that might get some stones thrown at you... ;) I was fearing I might catch a

Re: [aur-general] Package `pijul` in both AUR and Community-Testing

2021-07-02 Thread alad via aur-general
On 02/07/2021 01:35, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: On 7/1/21 8:34 AM, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: runc, which the entire container ecosystem has been depending on the past 7 years, got it's first stable release last week after almost 100 release candidates :) The very first v

Re: [aur-general] Package `pijul` in both AUR and Community-Testing

2021-07-01 Thread alad via aur-general
On 01/07/2021 14:34, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 09:52:54PM -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: On 6/30/21 9:35 PM, George Rawlinson via aur-general wrote: On 21-06-30 15:05, alad via aur-general wrote: The question if the package will ever make it to

Re: [aur-general] Package `pijul` in both AUR and Community-Testing

2021-06-30 Thread alad via aur-general
On 30/06/2021 13:54, Rafael Fontenelle via aur-general wrote: Hi Markus On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 6:45 AM Markus Arians via aur-general wrote: Hi everyone, today I noticed I was unable to push to the AUR repository for the pijul package with the server hook error message "remote: error: package

Re: [aur-general] TU application for Caleb, aka alerque

2021-06-22 Thread alad via aur-general
On 18/06/2021 19:59, Caleb Maclennan via aur-general wrote: On 2021-06-11 03:16, Archange wrote: so let’s start the discussion period. This message is a short public service announcement reminding all current TUs that today is the halfway point of the discussion period on my application. I know

Re: [aur-general] audacity3

2021-06-22 Thread alad via aur-general
On 22/06/2021 12:56, Sam Mulvey via aur-general wrote: On 6/22/21 3:16 AM, alad via aur-general wrote: There's 59 TUs looking after 70676 packages and moderating 85141 users. To make that manageable, you need some a strict set of rules. One of them is not submitting "-latest"

Re: [aur-general] TU application - Morganamilo

2021-06-22 Thread alad via aur-general
On 18/06/2021 15:35, Morgan Adamiec via aur-general wrote: Hey there! I'm Morgan, Morganamilo in most places and I'd like to apply to become a Trusted User with dvzrv and kpcyrd's sponsorship. Well, took you long enough. Good luck with the application! :) Alad

Re: [aur-general] audacity3

2021-06-22 Thread alad via aur-general
On 22/06/2021 12:05, Sam Mulvey via aur-general wrote: On 6/22/21 1:48 AM, Caleb Maclennan via aur-general wrote: As background, many years ago when working as an audio engineer I used to use it in production nearly full time. I'm quite familiar with it's past and the weird development practic

Re: [aur-general] TU application for Caleb, aka alerque

2021-06-22 Thread alad via aur-general
On 22/06/2021 10:48, Caleb Maclennan via aur-general wrote: On 2021-06-21 18:58, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: It appears you've been agitating on the AUR comments for some duplicates of the community/audacity package: Not "some duplicates", just one duplicate. ;-) Given the purpose of

Re: [aur-general] TU application for Caleb, aka alerque

2021-06-21 Thread alad via aur-general
On 21/06/2021 17:58, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: On 6/18/21 1:59 PM, Caleb Maclennan via aur-general wrote: If my existing packages or former FOSS involvement doesn't give enough fodder for discussion, lets try some unpopular opinions: Speaking of unpopular opinions, holy cow. It appea

Re: [aur-general] Issue a warning while (re)packaging a binary package?

2021-06-18 Thread alad via aur-general
On 18/06/2021 16:43, Jonathon Fernyhough via aur-general wrote: On 18/06/2021 14:05, Jan Kohnert via aur-general wrote: Hi, a new version of a (binary) package I'm maintaining (clockify-desktop) requires an executable /tmp directory to run. My immediate questions would be why, and is this an

Re: [aur-general] Notification of GPL violation

2021-05-26 Thread alad via aur-general
On 25/05/2021 21:01, Ralf Mardorf via aur-general wrote: On Tue, 25 May 2021 19:04:33 +0200, alad via aur-general wrote: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2021-May/036236.html "The Arch Linux project does not distribute your software." Probably hairsplitting, but in

Re: [aur-general] Notification of GPL violation

2021-05-25 Thread alad via aur-general
On 25/05/2021 18:58, Antoine Viallon via aur-general wrote: 25 mai 2021 16:42 "Genes Lists via aur-general" a écrit: As an outside observer of this thread, it seems like the time for discussion is over. This talk appears to center largely about opinions on civil litigation. Actually, this

Re: [aur-general] ...

2021-05-24 Thread alad via aur-general
On 24/05/2021 15:05, Manhong Dai wrote: On Mon, 2021-05-24 at 14:11 +0200, alad via aur-general wrote: On 24/05/2021 13:43, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: Who is this about? The noisetorch software, or the sge software? And what even is this??? ... The orginal discussion was already

Re: [aur-general] ...

2021-05-24 Thread alad via aur-general
On 24/05/2021 13:43, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: Who is this about? The noisetorch software, or the sge software? And what even is this??? ... The orginal discussion was already concluded with [1]. The ongoing discussion of sge, initiated by Manhong, is completely unrelated and nothi

Re: [aur-general] Notification of GPL violation

2021-05-17 Thread alad via aur-general
On 17/05/2021 17:53, NicoHood via aur-general wrote: On 5/17/21 4:11 PM, lawl via aur-general wrote: The license is very clear. I am not going to debate with everyone if any individual patch is acceptable or not. I expect the ArchLinux project will comply with the license and I'm unsubscribin

Re: [aur-general] Status of Garuda Linux PKGBUILD on AUR?

2021-05-13 Thread alad via aur-general
On 13/05/2021 08:24, Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen via aur-general wrote: On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:24:20PM +0200, alad via aur-general wrote: On 12/05/2021 22:52, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: I followed the upstream URL to: https://gitlab.com/garuda-linux/applications/mhwd-garuda The

Re: [aur-general] font-bh-ttf still on the blacklist

2021-05-12 Thread alad via aur-general
On 12/05/2021 23:07, Alexander Shpilkin via aur-general wrote: On Tue, 2021-05-11 at 17:53 +0200, stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote: alad via aur-general writes: On 10/05/2021 22:30, Stefan Husmann via aur-general wrote: Hello TUs, the PKGBUILD for font-bh-ttf still seems to be on the

Re: [aur-general] Status of Garuda Linux PKGBUILD on AUR?

2021-05-12 Thread alad via aur-general
On 12/05/2021 22:52, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: On 5/12/21 4:47 PM, alad via aur-general wrote: On 12/05/2021 22:32, Pedro Henrique Lara Campos via aur-general wrote: - mhwd, a Manjaro program that I believe assumes you're using the   Manjaro official kernel names... so if you

Re: [aur-general] Status of Garuda Linux PKGBUILD on AUR?

2021-05-12 Thread alad via aur-general
On 12/05/2021 12:07, fredbezies via aur-general wrote: Hello. I saw that packages meant for Manjaro or another archlinux based distro - not ArchLinux itself - were removed. Garuda Linux project - https://garudalinux.org/ - put on AUR at least 7 packages for its distribution. See https://aur.ar

Re: [aur-general] font-bh-ttf still on the blacklist

2021-05-10 Thread alad via aur-general
On 10/05/2021 22:30, Stefan Husmann via aur-general wrote: Hello TUs, the PKGBUILD for font-bh-ttf still seems to be on the [extra]-blacklist. Remote: error: package already provided by [extra]: font-bh-ttf But the package is not / no longer in [extra]. aurweb is broken so a TU has to p

Re: [aur-general] AUR mass deletion, why?

2021-05-04 Thread alad via aur-general
On 04/05/2021 14:04, Fabian Bornschein via aur-general wrote: Am Di, 4. Mai 2021 um 13:30:04 +0200 schrieb alad via aur-general : On 04/05/2021 09:52, Fabian Bornschein via aur-general wrote: Am Di, 4. Mai 2021 um 07:01:54 + schrieb George Rawlinson via aur-general <mailto:aur-gene

Re: [aur-general] AUR mass deletion, why?

2021-05-04 Thread alad via aur-general
On 04/05/2021 09:52, Fabian Bornschein via aur-general wrote: Am Di, 4. Mai 2021 um 07:01:54 + schrieb George Rawlinson via aur-general : On 21-05-04 08:23, Fabian Bornschein via aur-general wrote:  For fcgu-keyring I have had filled a removal request, so this one was  deliberate to be er

Re: [aur-general] Version downgraded and not being updated anymore

2021-03-03 Thread alad via aur-general
On 03/03/2021 08:01, Zekke Barton via aur-general wrote: I noticed that this aur package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/masterpdfeditor-libs-included/ Seems to have it's version rolled back and is now stuck on a version that still works with some keygen that's used to activate the program.

Re: [aur-general] How to change wrong author email address?

2021-02-18 Thread alad via aur-general
On 18/02/2021 12:57, Leonidas Spyropoulos via aur-general wrote: On 18/02/21, Uwe Koloska via aur-general wrote: Am 17.02.21 um 19:51 schrieb Uwe Koloska via aur-general: To make it clear: I'm speaking about the commit author, not the email address inside the PKGBUILD! I don't think it's poss

Re: [aur-general] [off-topic][ansible-aur] call for comment on pull request 50

2021-01-25 Thread alad via aur-general
On 25/01/2021 13:09, Ralf Mardorf via aur-general wrote: On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:03:12 +0100, Roland Puntaier wrote: On 1/23/21 1:31 PM, Roland Puntaier via aur-general wrote: mathematics allows 0. 0 is a number like every other. Yesno https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_number https://en.w

Re: [aur-general] Why are orphan requests accepted immediately although wiki says there's a 2 weeks wating period ?

2021-01-02 Thread alad via aur-general
On 02/01/2021 20:18, Lone_Wolf via aur-general wrote: On 02-01-2021 19:51, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: On Sat, Jan 02, 2021 at 07:46:04PM +0100, Lone_Wolf via aur-general wrote: Hi, Recently I received a notification message that a package I was co-maintainer from had changed owner

Re: [aur-general] Transition users from package x to package y (package x deprecated)

2020-12-30 Thread alad via aur-general
from some of the PKGBUILDs? Thanks! Since the deprecated ones would likely be unlisted from the AUR anyway, I'd say it only matters for the new package. Alad Am So., 27. Dez. 2020 um 02:35 Uhr schrieb alad via aur-general < aur-gene...@archlinux.org>: On 27/12/2020 02:30, alad via