> Hello, I'm 7Ji, maintainer of wechat-universal-bwrap[a] (wrongly typed as
wechat-universal in Kimiblock's original mail), and co-maintainer of
wechat-beta-bwrap[b]. leaeasy[c], the maintainer of -beta, is my friend. I
think it's necessary for me to clear up some misunderstanding and introduce
the
(sorry about the formatting. resend)
It's good that this is an open discussion so we can get all the facts
and misinformation presented for everyone to see and judge.
Let's get the main points addressed first. Details are next.
This is the subject of this discussion and the main points are abo
It's good that this is an open discussion so we can get all the facts
and misinformation presented for everyone to see and judge.
Let's get the main points addressed first. Details are next.
This is the subject of this discussion and the main points are about:
** AUR guideline on `Duplicate` pa
Update [4]
On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 9:57 AM S Umple wrote:
> Recently there's been a debacle about the wechat packaging in AUR.
> Essentially there were two competing packages wechat and wechat-bin [1]
> which are both popular. Package maintainer K(type user in AUR) of wechat
>
Recently there's been a debacle about the wechat packaging in AUR.
Essentially there were two competing packages wechat and wechat-bin [1]
which are both popular. Package maintainer K(type user in AUR) of wechat
took unbelievable measures to try to get rid of wechat-bin from AUR to
begin with and w
