ession :)
Now let's please move on.
[1] https://terms.archlinux.org/docs/code-of-conduct/
[2] https://terms.archlinux.org/docs/code-of-conduct/#enforcement
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
scalation.
Thanks in advance :)
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 4/22/25 1:41 PM, Robin Candau wrote:
On 4/17/25 5:15 PM, Robin Candau wrote:
On 4/3/25 8:46 AM, Robin Candau wrote:
On 4/3/25 7:51 AM, Felix Yan wrote:
On 4/3/25 13:00, Integral wrote:
Hello everyone,
My name is George, or Integral/Integral-Tech on AUR and other places.
I am writing this
On 4/17/25 5:15 PM, Robin Candau wrote:
On 4/3/25 8:46 AM, Robin Candau wrote:
On 4/3/25 7:51 AM, Felix Yan wrote:
On 4/3/25 13:00, Integral wrote:
Hello everyone,
My name is George, or Integral/Integral-Tech on AUR and other places.
I am writing this email to apply as an Arch Linux package
On 4/3/25 8:46 AM, Robin Candau wrote:
On 4/3/25 7:51 AM, Felix Yan wrote:
On 4/3/25 13:00, Integral wrote:
Hello everyone,
My name is George, or Integral/Integral-Tech on AUR and other places.
I am writing this email to apply as an Arch Linux package maintainer
as I have been sponsored by
On 4/3/25 8:46 AM, Robin Candau wrote:
On 4/3/25 7:51 AM, Felix Yan wrote:
On 4/3/25 13:00, Integral wrote:
Hello everyone,
My name is George, or Integral/Integral-Tech on AUR and other places.
I am writing this email to apply as an Arch Linux package maintainer
as I have been sponsored by
On 4/3/25 7:51 AM, Felix Yan wrote:
On 4/3/25 13:00, Integral wrote:
Hello everyone,
My name is George, or Integral/Integral-Tech on AUR and other places.
I am writing this email to apply as an Arch Linux package maintainer
as I have been sponsored by Felix Yan and Robin Candau.
I confirm my
?
O=0&SeB=m&K=Strit&outdated=&SB=p&SO=d&PP=50&submit=Go
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=greetd-qtgreet
[2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#depends
[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=tui-mines
[4] https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/
esponsibility to
rebuild them if needed. There's no reason to force a rebuild for
_everybody_ if _you_ need it (other people might still be on python
3.12, or have rebuilt the package on their side already for instance).
Thanks
--
g
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040
uidelines#Rules_of_submission
[4] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Unofficial_user_repositories
[5] https://repology.org/project/wechat/versions
[6]
https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur-reque...@lists.archlinux.org/message/DZBYAOYQGOEJEUOGSWWSOADVPC3FRHSG/
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
from your profile settings.
If not, tell me and I'll make the change for you.
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
e, since the different actors of this issue have now been
contacted regarding their respective fault, let's please drop the
subject here :)
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/goodvibes-git#comment-998356
[2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guideline
2534c81ee18913b4ce8c8970a54da
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
h=scx-scheds-git#n80
[15] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#url
[16] https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=contour#n9
[17] http://contour-terminal.org/
[18] https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=lapce-git#n32
[19] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacma
On 8/11/24 5:41 PM, Robin Candau wrote:
On 8/8/24 8:22 AM, Robin Candau wrote:
On 8/1/24 9:45 AM, Robin Candau wrote:
On 7/25/24 10:02 AM, Robin Candau wrote:
On 7/25/24 9:24 AM, Remi Gacogne wrote:
On 24/07/2024 22:38, mh4ckt3mh4ckt1c4s wrote:
My name is Quentin, or mh4ckt3mh4ckt1c4s
On 8/8/24 8:22 AM, Robin Candau wrote:
On 8/1/24 9:45 AM, Robin Candau wrote:
On 7/25/24 10:02 AM, Robin Candau wrote:
On 7/25/24 9:24 AM, Remi Gacogne wrote:
On 24/07/2024 22:38, mh4ckt3mh4ckt1c4s wrote:
My name is Quentin, or mh4ckt3mh4ckt1c4s/mh4ckwascut on the AUR and
other Arch projects
On 8/1/24 9:45 AM, Robin Candau wrote:
On 7/25/24 10:02 AM, Robin Candau wrote:
On 7/25/24 9:24 AM, Remi Gacogne wrote:
On 24/07/2024 22:38, mh4ckt3mh4ckt1c4s wrote:
My name is Quentin, or mh4ckt3mh4ckt1c4s/mh4ckwascut on the AUR and
other Arch projects, and I'm applying to become a Pa
On 7/25/24 10:02 AM, Robin Candau wrote:
On 7/25/24 9:24 AM, Remi Gacogne wrote:
On 24/07/2024 22:38, mh4ckt3mh4ckt1c4s wrote:
My name is Quentin, or mh4ckt3mh4ckt1c4s/mh4ckwascut on the AUR and
other Arch projects, and I'm applying to become a Package Maintainer.
My application is spon
is not one of them.
Let's please stop with that *not so* "very good point" and focus on
Quentin's application as a whole :)
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/mh4ckwascut
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP pub
On 7/25/24 9:24 AM, Remi Gacogne wrote:
On 24/07/2024 22:38, mh4ckt3mh4ckt1c4s wrote:
My name is Quentin, or mh4ckt3mh4ckt1c4s/mh4ckwascut on the AUR and
other Arch projects, and I'm applying to become a Package Maintainer.
My application is sponsored by Robin Candau (Antiz) and Rémi Ga
On 7/24/24 10:38 PM, mh4ckt3mh4ckt1c4s wrote:
Hi everyone,
My name is Quentin, or mh4ckt3mh4ckt1c4s/mh4ckwascut on the AUR and other Arch
projects, and I'm applying to become a Package Maintainer. My application is
sponsored by Robin Candau (Antiz) and Rémi Gacogne (rgacogne).
[...]
ong, why is it wrong?
Thank you.
Hi,
This is (one of the reason) why we require GPG signing.
The username itself isn't bulletproof, but the GPG signature is ;)
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Des
neral@lists.archlinux.org/thread/UA5F2CHIMRIEYQR54JL6NS6ES5S2HXDW/
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=motion-git#n14
[5] https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=unvpk-git#n14
[6] https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=rvpk#n13
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
aster/netctl2iwd/PKGBUILD#L13
[2] https://github.com/bertptrs/aur/blob/master/migrant/PKGBUILD#L15
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
=25&mlist=aur-requests%40lists.archlinux.org&q=manjusaka
Hi,
Thanks for the report, I'll deal with this situation.
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
7;ve seen Carl's alias (carsme) frequently over the
last year on the AUR and IRC; and always with good qualities
actions/interactions.
I had the occasion to talk with him a bit in the past and I confirm
Levente's feeling that Carl's seems like a very social and frie
gards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
and Marcell): Please behave, generally
speaking. As said earlier, both of your names are starting to be
mentioned a bit too often and, as said before, we just cannot allow (or
ignore) that much trouble by the same people over and over. Sorry I have
to say this, but take this as a formal war
On 1/22/24 14:43, Doug Newgard wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 09:24:04 +0100
Robin Candau wrote:
On 1/22/24 00:47, Aaron Liu wrote:
Changing the license does indeed change the package, as it means that
different license files are installed, though I'm not sure whether that
warrants bumpin
nes also include to quote parts of
the email you're responding to [2]. It's better to be able to respond to
both you and Mark in the same email :)
[1]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/General_guidelines#Mailing_lists
[1] https://spdx.org/licenses/
[2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/tit
that [1].
[1] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/aurweb/-/merge_requests/786
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ering"
sentences have not their place in regular users' exchanges.
Coming back to this ML thread topic:
As said previously, please let the staff handle this situation and
refrain from posting any more thoughts that would not help toward its
resolution.
[1] https://terms.arch
i,
Please use the comment section on the AURWeb package's page for such things.
There's no point posting that in the AUR General mailing list.
Thanks :)
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Descript
e a comment to their respective AURWeb page
instead (which is eventually the preferred thing to do before sending a
private email to AUR maintainers).
[1]
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines#Rules_of_submission
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92AC
[2]
https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=oojs-ui-archlinux-git#n7
[3] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/VCS_package_guidelines#Git
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Le 23/10/2023 à 23:10, Robin Candau a écrit :
Le 16/10/2023 à 09:24, Robin Candau a écrit :
Le 21/09/2023 à 10:46, Robin Candau a écrit :
Le 11/05/2023 à 12:31, Robin Candau a écrit :
Le 12/09/2022 à 22:58, Konstantin Gizdov via aur-general a écrit :
On 04/09/2022 16:34, Konstantin Gizdov
Le 16/10/2023 à 09:24, Robin Candau a écrit :
Le 21/09/2023 à 10:46, Robin Candau a écrit :
Le 11/05/2023 à 12:31, Robin Candau a écrit :
Le 12/09/2022 à 22:58, Konstantin Gizdov via aur-general a écrit :
On 04/09/2022 16:34, Konstantin Gizdov wrote:
Hi,
As per the TU Bylaws following the
Le 21/10/2023 à 14:48, Lone_Wolf a écrit :
On 21-10-2023 10:05, Robin Candau wrote:
As such, a package specifically made for derivatives (like this one,
made to be used with the runit init system) is not allowed on the AUR.
On the other hand runit is available from aur and archwiki
ssible publicly, you'll have to
upload it somewhere else than the AUR.
Best,
Eric
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Le 21/09/2023 à 10:46, Robin Candau a écrit :
Le 11/05/2023 à 12:31, Robin Candau a écrit :
Le 12/09/2022 à 22:58, Konstantin Gizdov via aur-general a écrit :
On 04/09/2022 16:34, Konstantin Gizdov wrote:
Hi,
As per the TU Bylaws following the discussion to rename the Truster
Users [1], the
Le 27/09/2023 à 10:50, Robin Candau a écrit :
Le 27/09/2023 à 06:18, a...@nullvoid.me a écrit :
Hi,
Hi,
[...]
Now, regarding the examples you gave, while there are no clear
statement/guidelines about such packages on the AUR side (yet?), such
controversial topics are already pointed out
e on an actual statement
leading to an update of the AUR guidelines/rules (if needed) to be able
to act legitimately (or not, depending on what the conclusion is) upon
such judged "illegal/unethical/controversial" packages in the future.
I hope my points bring a new way of looking at
Le 26/09/2023 à 22:02, Connor Behan a écrit :
Sorry but I don't buy the logic here.
That's fine, that thread is there to debate :D
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 4:21 PM Robin Candau <mailto:an...@archlinux.org>> wrote:
Le 26/09/2023 à 20:11, netsysf...@das-labor.org
<
ll accept, whatever the
final decision is. It would just be great to have a proper guideline on
this to avoid any more miss-understanding.
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Le 11/05/2023 à 12:31, Robin Candau a écrit :
Le 12/09/2022 à 22:58, Konstantin Gizdov via aur-general a écrit :
On 04/09/2022 16:34, Konstantin Gizdov wrote:
Hi,
As per the TU Bylaws following the discussion to rename the Truster
Users [1], the Trusted Users themselves must vote to approve
Le 17/09/2023 à 11:30, Robin Candau a écrit :
Le 17/09/2023 à 11:21, Robin Candau a écrit :
Le 17/09/2023 à 11:02, Tomaz Canabrava a écrit :
We have a few packages that are vim plugins, I don’t understand why
this would fail to be ok and other plugins, good.
The idea of a package is not to
Le 17/09/2023 à 11:21, Robin Candau a écrit :
Le 17/09/2023 à 11:02, Tomaz Canabrava a écrit :
We have a few packages that are vim plugins, I don’t understand why
this would fail to be ok and other plugins, good.
The idea of a package is not to help users update and keep up with new
versions
for Termux, not for Arch Linux. Take a look at the PKGBUILD:
mv"${srcdir}/bun-linux-aarch64/bun""${PREFIX}/bin/bun"
It's literally pointing to Termux prefix which is
`/data/data/com.termux/files/usr`.
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92AC
package is a Termux + aarch64 only package) so I can
accept it?
Thanks :)
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
is ever declared, I
assume a proper discussion/announcement would be made.
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#makedepends
[8]
https://github.com/bloomberg/bde-tools/archive/refs/tags/3.117.0.0.tar.gz
[9] https://bpa.st/LEUQ
[10]
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/DeveloperWiki:Building_in_a_clean_chroot
[11]
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/DeveloperWiki:How_to_be_a_package
Forwarding my answer to the ML
Message transféré
Sujet : Re: unable to build with makepkg (No such file or directory)
Date : Sat, 29 Jul 2023 18:05:03 +0200
De : Robin Candau
Pour : james smith
Le 29/07/2023 à 17:45, james smith a écrit :
trying to build this https
ou cannot submit
issues nor merge requests yet. At the moment, the aim is to migrate the
current "flyspray" bugtracker to GitLab issues and then open merge
requests as well in a later time but this is still a work in progress
currently.
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
Op
Le 09/07/2023 à 16:23, Michael Kogan a écrit :
Am So., 9. Juli 2023 um 11:08 Uhr schrieb Robin Candau
mailto:an...@archlinux.org>>:
Orphan requests are locked for 14 days after being submitted to give
some time for the maintainer to react. The oldest pending orphan
request
packages_out-of-date
[2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines#Orphan
[3]
https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur-reque...@lists.archlinux.org/thread/GDDXELBQL6VD6NHORKNGYIFIPTEU4FO7/
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP
d) that they're happy for me to take over and update it.
my username on AUR is dma.
thanks
The package has no maintainer currently, feel free to adopt it yourself
by clicking the "Adopt Package" button in the "Package Actions" menu
(you have to be connected to your AU
67K4UROAQ3BRAQBDX24W
[4] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines#Merge
[5]
https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur-reque...@lists.archlinux.org/thread/7RZEJBL6ISMRUTYRZTBMCTCSZTF7CULO
[6]
https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur-reque...@lists.archlinux.org/thread/FQSW
quot; in the PKGBUILD.
However, this cannot happen with that particular package because VCS/git
packages are not allowed on the main repos, so "lemoa*-git*" won't ever
go to the main repos.
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 7:12 AM Robin Candau wrote:
Le 03/07/2023 à 07:00, james
ource, switch to sha256 instead of md5 (I know the checksum is skipped
there, but better take the habit to use a stronger algorithm for the
potential future), better indentation in functions, etc...
[1]
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Meson_package_guidelines#Using_meson_binary_directly
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
/Transferring OP's reply to the proper mailing list/.
On Sun, Jul 2, 2023 at 6:59 PM Robin Candau wrote:
Le 02/07/2023 à 04:20, james smith a écrit :
I am trying to package this https://github.com/lemmygtk/lemoa
this is my pkgbuild any tips on how to improve it before I
tinue this discussion here please :)
For everyone's context, here's the initial PKGBUILD provided for a review:
https://bpa.st/TXEW2
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
Le 02/07/2023 à 20:59, Robin Candau a écrit :
Le 02/07/2023 à 04:20, james smith a écrit :
I am trying to package thi
ing
on applying the rename on the various relevant Arch ressources/projects.
Here's the MR for the bylaws:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/tu-bylaws/-/merge_requests/6
I'll update the progress in this thread.
I remain available if needed :)
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
Le 21/04/2023 à 11:26, Robin Candau a écrit :
Le 14/04/2023 à 11:04, Robin Candau a écrit :
Le 07/04/2023 à 10:51, Robin Candau a écrit :
Le 07/04/2023 à 10:46, Morten Linderud a écrit :
I confirm my sponsorship of Christian :)
This marks the beginning of the discussion period which will
Le 14/04/2023 à 11:04, Robin Candau a écrit :
Le 07/04/2023 à 10:51, Robin Candau a écrit :
Le 07/04/2023 à 10:46, Morten Linderud a écrit :
I confirm my sponsorship of Christian :)
This marks the beginning of the discussion period which will conclude
in two weeks on 2023-04-21. The voting
Le 07/04/2023 à 10:51, Robin Candau a écrit :
Le 07/04/2023 à 10:46, Morten Linderud a écrit :
I confirm my sponsorship of Christian :)
This marks the beginning of the discussion period which will conclude
in two weeks on 2023-04-21. The voting will start on the same day and
conclude on 2023
Le 07/04/2023 à 10:46, Morten Linderud a écrit :
I confirm my sponsorship of Christian :)
This marks the beginning of the discussion period which will conclude in
two weeks on 2023-04-21. The voting will start on the same day and
conclude on 2023-04-28.
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
Linderud (Foxboron) and Robin Candau (Antiz)
which I am both very thankful for because they also guided me through
the application process!
I confirm my sponsorship.
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description
Thanks for adopting a more comprehensive and helping point of view.
Once again, it was more about the form than the initial goal. Help is
always appreciated :)
Your AUR account is un-suspended.
--
Regards,
Robin Candau
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
le reason that
you think that "if mine has been deleted then this one should too" is a
sane and appreciated approach.
TU's aren't judges, as you said, but I definitely want some justice here.
Don't worry, regardless, the package you linked will be examined and
"j
ts in a so short
period of time with a vague predefined message like that.
I get that you were trying to help, but this isn't helpful actually and
that has been inevitably assimilated to spam.
Please report packages properly and avoid spamming like that in the future.
--
Regard
Le 25/01/2023 à 11:56, Caleb Maclennan a écrit :
On 2023-01-17 14:40, Robin Candau wrote:
Since the related packages I currently maintain in the AUR does not
depend on a specific toolchain to be built (as seen with upstream), is
it safe for me to drop the toolchain definition in the PKGBUILD or
ause the stable toolchain might not be
installed and using a newer toolchain shouldn't break the build. (In
general, I would expect the stable toolchain to be the default, to
match the rust package.)
--
Regards,
Robin Candau
OpenPGP_0xD33FAA16B937F3B2.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Le 16/01/2023 à 12:12, Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 12:03 PM Robin Candau
wrote:
- I maintain a few packages in the AUR with what I think are
high-quality/clean PKGBUILDs [1].
[1]
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages?O=0&SeB=M&
Le 09/01/2023 à 13:48, Frederick Zhang a écrit :
> And I just realised:
>
>> url="https://github.com/wakatime/$pkgname";
>> source=("git+https://github.com/Tatsh/kate-wakatime";)
>
> I think it's better to use the same repository for URL and source.
Not necessarily. If the package has an offici
Le 09/01/2023 à 13:14, Sharafat Karim a écrit :
> Hi there,
Hi!
> I'm writing to request that my PKGBUILD for kate-wakatime be added to the
> Arch User Repository (AUR). I have tested the PKGBUILD and it works as
> expected. But I'm unsure about this script's formatting or other checkups.
> I
Le 03/01/2023 à 21:29, Robin Candau a écrit :
Yeah, I definitely have an issue with my PGP settings in Thunderbird. I
assume this mail will have problems as well.
I'm really sorry about that... I'm looking that up for the next messages!
It seems like my protonmail address doesn'
Le 03/01/2023 à 21:21, Levente Polyak a écrit :
> On 1/3/23 21:16, Robin Candau wrote:
>> Le 03/01/2023 à 20:37, Morten Linderud a écrit :
>>> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 07:10:47PM +, Robin Candau wrote:
>>>> Le 03/01/2023 à 18:40, Morten Linderud a écrit :
>&
Le 03/01/2023 à 20:37, Morten Linderud a écrit :
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 07:10:47PM +0000, Robin Candau wrote:
>> Le 03/01/2023 à 18:40, Morten Linderud a écrit :
>>
>>> I looked over them and they generally seem fine. The only weird part I have
>>> found is
Le 03/01/2023 à 18:40, Morten Linderud a écrit :
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 11:03:07AM +0000, Robin Candau wrote:
>> Hello,
> Yo,
Hi
>> My name's Robin Candau and I'd like to apply to become a Trusted User.
>> My sponsors are Leonidas Spyropoulos and T.J. Townsend
Hello,
My name's Robin Candau and I'd like to apply to become a Trusted User.
My sponsors are Leonidas Spyropoulos and T.J. Townsend
.
I'm 26 years old and I live in France. I'm working as a Linux system,
Infrastructure and DevOps engineer.
I've been using Linux for
Le 15/12/2022 à 15:34, Polarian a écrit :
> Hello,
Hi
> [...]
>
> I also recommend that the AUR ArchWiki pages be extended to have
> guides on how to package every non-binary programming language which
> is common, as there is currently no "conventional" method of doing it,
> which means each AUR p
Hi,
> This is quite interesting, because a package which gains a high amount
> of votes in a day will have a very high popularity for a short period
> of time, which is a little misleading.
>
> I thought it would be based on the number of people looking at the
> package/webpage or cloning the repos
Hi Polarian,
From an old thread [1]: "Popularity is the sum of all votes with each vote
being weighted with a factor of 0.98 per day since its creation."
[1]
https://aur-general.archlinux.narkive.com/XuG8fEVO/how-the-popularity-value-is-being-calculated-for-a-package-in-the-aur4
Regards,
Anti
Hi,
Here's how I would have wrote it (see commented changes at the bottom):
# Maintainer: Minecraftchest1
pkgname=file-sharing-tool
pkgver=0.2.0
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="A tool to help setup file sharing using ssh."
arch=('any')
url=
["https://gitlab.com/minecraftchest1/steamdeck-file-share-tool";](ht
85 matches
Mail list logo
