Am 28.02.23 um 23:51 schrieb irecca@gmail.com:
Or there are no rules and TUs actually do what they want?
Simply put, yes. Actually the project is run by a club of people,
called Arch-devs. It is their project, not yours. Although they
admit new members, and work partially in public, they
Danke fürs Corn-Poppen! :-)
Am 16.04.21 um 11:31 schrieb Markus Schaaf via aur-general:
> created and packed, despite !emptydirs in options. Maybe !emptydirs is
> not working?
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/53770
(Would vote for that silly and long standing bug with obvious solution,
but cannot log in to fl
Am 16.04.21 um 11:31 schrieb Markus Schaaf via aur-general:
> created and packed, despite !emptydirs in options. Maybe !emptydirs is
> not working?
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/53770
(Would vote for that silly and long standing bug with obvious solution,
but cannot log in to fl
What I have found myself, looking closer. (Had been a very tired yesterday.)
> I have made a PKGBUILD for a Perl module according to the Wiki. The
> module's files get installed to
>
> /usr/lib/perl5/5.32/vendor_perl
Actually, the module's .pm is installed correctly to /usr/share/perl5.
Ne
Hi,
I have made a PKGBUILD for a Perl module according to the Wiki. The
module's files get installed to
/usr/lib/perl5/5.32/vendor_perl
like most/all other such packages. But that module (and probably many
others) do not depend on the exact version of Perl interpreter. I always
find it a
Am 10.03.21 um 10:33 schrieb Barnabás Béres via aur-general:
What is wrong with it?
Nothing. There are AUR helpers that rebuild git-packages automatically,
if needed. E.g. yay does it with the --devel option. (You need to run
yay --gendb once before.)
