Re: [aur-general] TU Application - serebit

2022-08-15 Thread Jonas Witschel via aur-general
On 2022-08-08 17:23, Jonas Witschel via aur-general wrote: > On 2022-07-25 13:57, Campbell Jones via aur-general wrote: > > My name is Campbell Jones, my online handle is serebit, and this is my > > application to become a Trusted User. [...] > > The discussion period is

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - serebit

2022-08-08 Thread Jonas Witschel via aur-general
On 2022-07-25 13:57, Campbell Jones via aur-general wrote: > My name is Campbell Jones, my online handle is serebit, and this is my > application to become a Trusted User. [...] The discussion period is over now, please cast your votes :) https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/138 Cheers, Jonas signatu

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - serebit

2022-08-01 Thread Jonas Witschel via aur-general
On 2022-07-25 13:57, Campbell Jones via aur-general wrote: > My name is Campbell Jones, my online handle is serebit, and this is my > application to become a > Trusted User. I've been graciously sponsored by Jonas Witschel (diabonas) and > Leonidas > Spyropoulos (artafinde). Half of the 14-day

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - serebit

2022-07-26 Thread Jonas Witschel via aur-general
On 2022-07-25 20:09, Jonathon Fernyhough via aur-general wrote: > While EndeavourOS is one of the closest derivatives I'm aware of, they still > have their own repo with some tooling and hooks which might (maybe) affect > things once installed (package building can/should be done in a clean Arch >

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - serebit

2022-07-25 Thread Jonas Witschel via aur-general
On 2022-07-25 13:57, Campbell Jones via aur-general wrote: > My name is Campbell Jones, my online handle is serebit, and this is my > application to become a Trusted User. I've been graciously sponsored by Jonas > Witschel (diabonas) and Leonidas Spyropoulos (artafinde). [...] I confirm my sponso

Re: [aur-general] Deletion of vi-vim-symlink and neovim-symlinks

2022-04-22 Thread Jonas Witschel via aur-general
On 2022-04-22 10:42, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: > [...] As such, I think I'll be re-uploading unless you can show me > where this violates the rules. Without going into the details of this dispute, I will point out that this is not how the AUR works: the Trusted Users are the moderators o