Hello,
在 2024/3/17 03:56, Aaron Liu written:
To reduce this confusion, maybe the latter version's package should be
named like "wechat-uos-qt" instead.
Sorry but this QT version of Wechat is so-called "universal" because it
is "universal" to multiple China state-backed Linux distros and multi
Hello, I'm 7Ji, maintainer of wechat-universal-bwrap[a] (wrongly typed
as wechat-universal in Kimiblock's original mail), and co-maintainer of
wechat-beta-bwrap[b]. leaeasy[c], the maintainer of -beta, is my friend.
I think it's necessary for me to clear up some misunderstanding and
introduce t
informed to do so, instead of posting the broken
PKGBUILD again and again. Posting a deleted package to AUR automatically
revives it and considered an objection to the previous accepted deletion
request. That itself is breaking the rules.
Please, calm down when you posting and tone like that is really not helpful.
Yours,
Guoxin Pu (7Ji)
