On 1/24/25 12:11 PM, Klaus Tachtler wrote:
Hi,
I am encountering a problem with the installation of an AUR package I
have built.
During the installation I get the following error message:
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
libtlsrpt-git: /usr/local/share/man exists in f
On 11/13/24 8:32 AM, Actionless Loveless wrote:
> and on the flagging page itself,
i don't see anything here suggesting that there are some rule
exemptions for a VCS package. if you have another reliable source, feel
free to quote&link that.
The full text when flagging a VCS package:
Us
On 11/13/24 8:10 AM, Robin Candau wrote:
On 11/13/24 2:51 PM, Actionless Loveless wrote:
The field is designed for notifying the maintainer of the package when
a new release is available, not for reporting any other sort of
problems (for which there are other means of reporting).
As pointed o
On Wed, 8 May 2024 19:03:33 -0500
"David C. Rankin" wrote:
> AUR folks,
>
>This is a general question that may catch others off guard. Having patch
> for the 6.8 changes when the kernel was release and having no issues through
> 6.8.9-Arch1, I was very surprised to see build failures in th
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 01:35:07 +0100
Mat Moul wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seem I am attacked by xiota on my AUR octopi packages.
>
> We had an exchange for over 3 hours before it ended abruptly.
>
> I think I am within my rights and ask you to look at the situation.
>
> Comment on https://aur.archlinux
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 15:43:23 +
"Eldeberen" wrote:
> - How do I manage the decommissioning of the old tools?
You request that they be merged into the new package. Anyone that has
notifications set should get an email.
> - I understand I'm not allowed to use the 'replaces' directive on the
> P
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 09:24:04 +0100
Robin Candau wrote:
> On 1/22/24 00:47, Aaron Liu wrote:
> > Changing the license does indeed change the package, as it means that
> > different license files are installed, though I'm not sure whether that
> > warrants bumping the pkgrel,
> Here it is not q
On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 09:46:04 -0500
"Lime In a Jacket (Aaron Liu)" wrote:
> I am quite confused here, nobody seems to have sent 3 emails. Which person
> would you be talking about?
>
> Cheers,
> Aᴀʀᴏɴ
Sure they did.
https://lists.archlinux.org/hyperkitty/list/aur-general@lists.archlinux.org/threa
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 16:56:16 -0600
"David C. Rankin" wrote:
>There is no way to pull from the internal CPACK name to get precisely the
> CPACK_PACKAGE_VERSION out of it. You also cannot simply add a "TZST"
> generator and then either "cmake --build . --target package" or "make
> package" to u
> If there is
> ever an actual "Release" of wiringX, then we can remove the pkgver() function
> entirely.
That's not how -git PKGBUILDs work. It builds from HEAD and should always build
from HEAD. You really need to fix the pkgver function. Looking at the upstream
CMakeLists.txt, I would version
In addition to things others have said.
> url="httpx://wiringx.org/"
Typo
> pkgver() {
>cd "${srcdir}/$_gitname"
>echo $(git rev-list --count HEAD).$(git rev-parse --short HEAD)
> }
This will cause problems if there is ever a release. See
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/VCS_package_gui
On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 18:57:46 +0100 (CET)
myself...@tutanota.de wrote:
> I'm asking for my account to be restored on the basis presented above.
>
On the basis of ignoring the moderators repeatedly?
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 18:06:35 +0100
Lex Black wrote:
> But today came the next surprise. An orphan request with the words
> "Orphaning to facilitate quicker merging to papermerge-core.". Which got
> granted and subsequently taken by the new "maintainer". Again without
> trying to contact me before
On Sat, 6 May 2023 12:54:42 +0200
Christian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I took over the package blink1. It is not a -git package so it should
> have a stable checksum, in my opinion. But since the project it builds
> uses a submodule, the package uses source=("git+https:/…) and SKIP for
> the checksum. Thi
On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 07:55:44 -0300
jamil bio wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I would like to introduce my project to the AUR mailing list. I am about to
> upload a PKGBUILD of a `datediff.sh' script which does calendrical
> calculations with shell built-ins, and has got some other few functions as
> well.
>
On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 22:38:29 +0300
Greg Minshall wrote:
> hi. i'm trying to submit my first package to AUR. my package files are
> here:
>
> https://git.sr.ht/~minshall/aur-orgtbl-query/tree
>
>
> if anyone has a chance to look over my PKGBUILD (and any other of the
> files), and has
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 13:34:05 +
Polarian wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am pretty new to the AUR, however I have read through the arch wiki
> and this question is not really referenced there.
>
> I have seen some -git packages which update the package on each new
> commit to master, which is what I
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 08:31:27 -0700
Brett Cornwall wrote:
> On 2022-04-22 09:58, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote:
> >Recently vi-vim-symlink and neovim-symlinks were deleted from the AUR. These
> >are used by a lot of people to set up their systems, and a lot of people
> &g
Recently vi-vim-symlink and neovim-symlinks were deleted from the AUR. These
are used by a lot of people to set up their systems, and a lot of people
want to know why [1]. They do not violate any AUR rules and have been available
in the AUR for a very long time, well over 6 years for neovim-symlink
On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 01:33:20 +
Jonathon Fernyhough via aur-general wrote:
> On 02/01/2022 22:54, Xyne via aur-general wrote:
> > I actually would be in favor of using the -bin suffix even for packages
> > without a non-bin variant.
>
> I was under the impression that `-bin` was to be used f
On Fri, 31 Dec 2021 21:40:38 -0800
Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote:
>
> Would you be kind enough to post that to the thread I started over on
> aur-dev? (message ID <20211229050623.2jghonze56wi4fxe@faun>, subject
> "Packaging upstream binaries when we already have official releases")
>
>
On Sat, 1 Jan 2022 05:33:08 +0100
Xyne via aur-general wrote:
> On 2021-12-28 19:52 -0800
> Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote:
>
> >On 2021-12-29 03:27, eNV25 via aur-general wrote:
> >>So in this case the package would be fine if it had a different name,
> >>with a suffix like -upstream-bi
On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 10:34:58 -0800
Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote:
> On 2021-12-28 12:08, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote:
> >On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 09:21:01 -0800
> >Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote:
> >
> >> Feel free to post an RFC. In the mea
On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 09:21:01 -0800
Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote:
> Feel free to post an RFC. In the meantime, I'll continue to follow
> the rules that have been established.
Established where? Upstream builds as -bin packages were fine in the AUR for
years, it's only recently that a coup
On Mon, 17 May 2021 14:11:41 +
lawl via aur-general wrote:
> The license is very clear. I am not going to debate with everyone if any
> individual patch is acceptable or not.
>
> I expect the ArchLinux project will comply with the license and I'm
> unsubscribing again from this mailing lis
On Mon, 17 May 2021 15:48:09 +0200
Michael Kogan via aur-general wrote:
> I think the patch in question has been reduced to only modifying the
> version 16 hours ago, before that it did a bit more than that[1]. But I
> guess, in the current state[2], it should be acceptable?
>
> [1]
> https://au
On Mon, 17 May 2021 13:32:26 +
lawl via aur-general wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm the developer of NoiseTorch (https://github.com/lawl/NoiseTorch/).
> I faithfully believe that the package "noisetorch" in the ArchLinux User
> Repository ("AUR") (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/noisetorch/) viol
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 16:32:43 +0200
Ralf Mardorf via aur-general wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't understand why something that worked a short while back, doesn't
> work anymore.
>
> patch-4.19.184-rt75.patch.xz ... Skipped
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/70261
On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 12:52:13 +0100
Barnabás Béres via aur-general wrote:
> Dear Arch users,
> I would like to know how I can submit a package (namely hugo) to the
> AUR that is already in the community repo. I would like to do this
> because I need the latest version of hugo for my work and the p
On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 19:11:48 -0500
Ben Goldberg via aur-general wrote:
> > I don't see an account with that email address. What's your username?
>
> My username is zethra.
The email on that account isn't hidden, it's b...@benaaron.dev
30 matches
Mail list logo
